Suppr超能文献

卡培他滨和贝伐珠单抗维持治疗对比观察治疗转移性结直肠癌:III 期 CAIRO3 研究的更新结果和分子亚组分析。

Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab versus observation in metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results and molecular subgroup analyses of the phase 3 CAIRO3 study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2128-2134. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx322.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The phase 3 CAIRO3 study showed that capecitabine plus bevacizumab (CAP-B) maintenance treatment after six cycles capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab (CAPOX-B) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients is effective, without compromising quality of life. In this post hoc analysis with updated follow-up and data regarding sidedness, we defined subgroups according to RAS/BRAF mutation status and mismatch repair (MMR) status, and investigated their influence on treatment efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 558 patients with previously untreated mCRC and stable disease or better after six cycles CAPOX-B induction treatment were randomised to either CAP-B maintenance treatment (n = 279) or observation (n = 279). Upon first progression, patients were to receive CAPOX-B reintroduction until second progression (PFS2, primary end point). We centrally assessed RAS/BRAF mutation status and MMR status, or used local results if central assessment was not possible. Intention-to-treat stratified Cox models adjusted for baseline covariables were used to examine whether treatment efficacy was modified by RAS/BRAF mutation status.

RESULTS

RAS, BRAF mutations, and MMR deficiency were detected in 240/420 (58%), 36/381 (9%), and 4/279 (1%) patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 87 months (IQR 69-97), all mutational subgroups showed significant improvement from maintenance treatment for the primary end point PFS2 [RAS/BRAF wild-type: hazard ratio (HR) 0.57 (95% CI 0.39-0.84); RAS-mutant: HR 0.74 (0.55-0.98); V600EBRAF-mutant: HR 0.28 (0.12-0.64)] and secondary end points, except for the RAS-mutant subgroup regarding overall survival. Adjustment for sidedness instead of primary tumour location yielded comparable results. Although right-sided tumours were associated with inferior prognosis, both patients with right- and left-sided tumours showed significant benefit from maintenance treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

CAP-B maintenance treatment after six cycles CAPOX-B is effective in first-line treatment of mCRC across all mutational subgroups. The benefit of maintenance treatment was most pronounced in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type and V600EBRAF-mutant tumours.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV NUMBER: NCT00442637.

摘要

背景

III 期 CAIRO3 研究表明,转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者在接受六周期卡培他滨、奥沙利铂和贝伐珠单抗(CAPOX-B)诱导治疗后,使用卡培他滨联合贝伐单抗(CAP-B)维持治疗是有效的,且不会降低生活质量。在这项具有更新随访数据的事后分析中,我们根据 RAS/BRAF 突变状态和错配修复(MMR)状态对患者进行了亚组定义,并研究了它们对治疗效果的影响。

方法

共纳入 558 例先前未经治疗的 mCRC 患者,这些患者在接受六周期 CAPOX-B 诱导治疗后疾病稳定或有更好的疗效。将这些患者随机分为 CAP-B 维持治疗组(n=279)或观察组(n=279)。在首次进展时,患者将接受 CAPOX-B 重新引入治疗,直至第二次进展(PFS2,主要终点)。我们集中评估了 RAS/BRAF 突变状态和 MMR 状态,如果无法进行集中评估,则使用局部结果。使用意向治疗分层 Cox 模型调整基线协变量,以检查治疗效果是否受 RAS/BRAF 突变状态的影响。

结果

在 420 例患者中检测到 240 例(58%)存在 RAS、BRAF 突变,381 例患者中检测到 36 例(9%)存在 V600E BRAF 突变,279 例患者中检测到 4 例(1%)存在 MMR 缺陷。在中位随访 87 个月(IQR 69-97)时,所有突变亚组在主要终点 PFS2(RAS/BRAF 野生型:风险比(HR)0.57(95%CI 0.39-0.84);RAS 突变型:HR 0.74(0.55-0.98);V600E BRAF 突变型:HR 0.28(0.12-0.64))和次要终点中均表现出显著获益,除 RAS 突变型亚组的总生存外。调整侧别而不是原发肿瘤位置得到了类似的结果。虽然右侧肿瘤与预后不良相关,但右侧和左侧肿瘤患者均从维持治疗中获益。

结论

在 CAPOX-B 一线治疗 mCRC 中,在所有突变亚组中,六周期 CAPOX-B 后使用 CAP-B 维持治疗是有效的。在 RAS/BRAF 野生型和 V600E BRAF 突变型肿瘤患者中,维持治疗的获益最为显著。

临床试验.gov 编号:NCT00442637。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验