Suppr超能文献

一项随机、开放标签、多中心、3 期研究,旨在比较艾瑞布林与医生选择的治疗方案在晚期非小细胞肺癌患者中的疗效和安全性。

A randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of eribulin to treatment of physician's choice in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Division of Integrated Oncology, Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation Hospital, Kobe, Japan.

Department of Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2241-2247. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx284.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eribulin is a microtubule dynamics inhibitor with a novel mechanism of action. This phase 3 study aimed to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving eribulin to treatment of physician's choice (TPC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC who had received ≥2 prior therapies, including platinum-based doublet and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, were randomly assigned to receive eribulin or TPC (gemcitabine, pemetrexed, vinorelbine, docetaxel). The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and objective response rate.

RESULTS

Five hundred and forty patients were randomized to either eribulin (n = 270) or TPC (n = 270). Median OS for eribulin and TPC was the same: 9.5 months [hazard ratio (HR): 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-1.41; P = 0.13]. Progression-free survival for eribulin and TPC was 3.0 and 2.8 months, respectively (HR: 1.09; 95% confidence interval: 0.90-1.32; P = 0.39). The objective response rate was 12% for eribulin and 15% for TPC. Clinical benefit rate (eribulin, 57%; TPC, 55%) and disease control rate (eribulin, 63%; TPC, 58%) were similar between treatment arms. The most common adverse event was neutropenia, which occurred in 57% of eribulin patients and 49% of TPC patients at all grades. Other non-hematologic side-effects were manageable and similar in both groups except for peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grades; eribulin, 16%; TPC, 9%).

CONCLUSION

This phase 3 study did not demonstrate superiority of eribulin over TPC with regard to overall survival. However, eribulin does show activity in the third-line setting for NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION ID

www.ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01454934.

摘要

背景

艾立布林是一种微管动力学抑制剂,具有新颖的作用机制。这项 3 期研究旨在比较接受艾立布林治疗的多线治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的总生存期(OS)与医生选择的治疗(TPC)。

患者和方法

接受过≥2 种治疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者,包括铂类双联和表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂,被随机分配接受艾立布林或 TPC(吉西他滨、培美曲塞、长春瑞滨、多西他赛)。主要终点为 OS。次要终点为无进展生存期和客观缓解率。

结果

540 名患者被随机分为艾立布林(n=270)或 TPC(n=270)。艾立布林和 TPC 的中位 OS 相同:9.5 个月[风险比(HR):1.16;95%置信区间:0.95-1.41;P=0.13]。艾立布林和 TPC 的无进展生存期分别为 3.0 和 2.8 个月[HR:1.09;95%置信区间:0.90-1.32;P=0.39]。艾立布林的客观缓解率为 12%,TPC 为 15%。临床获益率(艾立布林,57%;TPC,55%)和疾病控制率(艾立布林,63%;TPC,58%)在治疗组之间相似。最常见的不良事件是中性粒细胞减少症,艾立布林组所有级别发生率为 57%,TPC 组为 49%。其他非血液学副作用在两组中是可以管理的,除了周围感觉神经病变(所有级别;艾立布林,16%;TPC,9%)外,两组相似。

结论

这项 3 期研究并未显示艾立布林在总生存期方面优于 TPC。然而,艾立布林在 NSCLC 的三线治疗中确实显示出活性。

试验注册

www.ClinicalTrials.gov;NCT01454934。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc0d/5834051/666bf13bbe76/mdx284f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验