Suppr超能文献

在高容量中心,特定手术的心输出量引导血流动力学算法对接受胰十二指肠切除术患者预后的影响:一项回顾性比较研究

The effect of a surgery-specific cardiac output-guided haemodynamic algorithm on outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in a high-volume centre: a retrospective comparative study.

作者信息

Weinberg L, Banting J, Churilov L, McLeod R L, Fernandes K, Chao I, Ho T, Ianno D, Liang V, Muralidharan V, Christophi C, Nikfarjam M

机构信息

Associate Professor, Departments of Surgery, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Sep;45(5):569-580. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500507.

Abstract

In this retrospective observational study performed in a high-volume hepatobiliary-pancreatic unit, we evaluated the effect of a surgery-specific goal-directed therapy (GDT) physiologic algorithm on complications and length of hospital stay. We compared patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with either a standardised Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program (usual care group), or a standardised Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program in combination with a surgery-specific cardiac output-guided algorithm (GDT group). We included 145 consecutive patients: 47 in the GDT group and 98 in the usual care group. Multivariable associations between GDT and lengths of stay and complications were investigated using negative binomial regression. Postoperative complications were common and occurred at similar frequencies amongst the GDT and usual care groups: 64% versus 68% respectively, =0.71; odds ratio 0.82; (95% confidence interval 0.39-1.70). There were fewer cardiorespiratory complications in the GDT group. Median (interquartile range) length of hospital stay was ten days (8.0-14.0) in the GDT group compared to 13 days (8.8-21.3) in the usual care group, =0.01. Median (interquartile range) total intraoperative fluid was 3,000 ml (2,050-4,175) in the GDT group compared to 4,500 ml (3,275-5,325) in the usual care group, <0.0001; but by day one, the median (interquartile range) fluid balance was similar (1,198 ml [700-1,729] in the GDT group versus 977 ml [419-2,044] in the usual care group, =0.96). Use of vasoactive medications was higher in the GDT group. In our patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy, GDT was associated with restrictive intraoperative fluid intervention, fewer cardiorespiratory complications and a shorter hospital length of stay compared to usual care. However, we could not exclude an influence of surgical caseload, which we have previously found to be an important variable. We also could not relate the increased hospital length of stay to cardiorespiratory complications in individual patients. Therefore, these observational retrospective findings would require confirmation in a prospective randomised study.

摘要

在这项在一家大型肝胆胰科室开展的回顾性观察研究中,我们评估了一种针对手术的目标导向治疗(GDT)生理算法对并发症和住院时间的影响。我们将接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者与接受标准化术后加速康复计划(常规护理组)或接受标准化术后加速康复计划并结合针对手术的心输出量导向算法(GDT组)的患者进行了比较。我们纳入了145例连续的患者:GDT组47例,常规护理组98例。使用负二项回归研究GDT与住院时间和并发症之间的多变量关联。术后并发症很常见,在GDT组和常规护理组中发生率相似:分别为64%和68%,P = 0.71;比值比0.82;(95%置信区间0.39 - 1.70)。GDT组的心肺并发症较少。GDT组的中位(四分位间距)住院时间为10天(8.0 - 14.0),而常规护理组为13天(8.8 - 21.3),P = 0.01。GDT组的中位(四分位间距)术中总液体量为3000毫升(2050 - 4175),而常规护理组为4500毫升(3275 - 5325),P < 0.0001;但到第1天,中位(四分位间距)液体平衡相似(GDT组为1198毫升[700 - 1729],常规护理组为977毫升[419 - 2044],P = 0.96)。GDT组血管活性药物的使用更高。在我们接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者中,与常规护理相比,GDT与限制性术中液体干预、较少的心肺并发症和较短的住院时间相关。然而,我们不能排除手术病例数量的影响,我们之前发现手术病例数量是一个重要变量。我们也无法将住院时间延长与个体患者的心肺并发症联系起来。因此,这些观察性回顾性研究结果需要在前瞻性随机研究中得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验