Kratz Thomas, Simon Christina, Fendrich Volker, Schneider Ralph, Wulf Hinnerk, Kratz Caroline, Efe Turgay, Schüttler Karl F, Zoremba Martin
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinique Bénigne Joly, Talant, France.
Technol Health Care. 2016 Nov 14;24(6):899-907. doi: 10.3233/THC-161237.
Goal directed fluid management in major abdominal surgery has shown to reduce perioperative complications. The approach aims to optimize the intravascular fluid volume by use of minimally invasive devices which calculate flow-directed variables such as stroke volume (SV) and stroke volume variation (SVV).
We aimed to show the feasibility of routinely implementing this type of hemodynamic monitoring during pancreatic surgery, and to evaluate its effects in terms of perioperative fluid management and postoperative outcomes.
All patients undergoing pancreatic surgery at a university hospital during two successive 12 months periods were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. Twelve months after the implementation of a standard operating procedure for a goal directed therapy (GDT, N = 45) using a pulse contour automated hemodynamic device were compared with a similar period before its use (control, N = 31) regarding mortality, length of hospital and ICU stay, postoperative complications and the use of fluids and vasopressors.
Overall, 76 patients were analysed. Significantly less crystalloids were used in the GDT group. Patients receiving GDT showed significantly fewer severe complications (insufficiency of intestinal anastomosis: 0 vs. 5 (P = 0.0053) and renal failure: 0 vs. 4 (P = 0.0133). Mortality for pancreatic surgery was 1 vs. 3 patients, (P = 0.142), and length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) was 4.38 ± 3.63 vs. 6.87 ± 10.02 (P= 0.0964) days. Use of blood products was significantly less within the GDT group.
Implementation of a SOP for a GDT in the daily routine using flow-related parameters is feasible and is associated with better outcomes in pancreatic surgery.
在腹部大手术中,目标导向性液体管理已被证明可减少围手术期并发症。该方法旨在通过使用微创设备来优化血管内容量,这些设备可计算诸如每搏输出量(SV)和每搏输出量变异度(SVV)等血流导向变量。
我们旨在证明在胰腺手术期间常规实施此类血流动力学监测的可行性,并评估其在围手术期液体管理和术后结局方面的效果。
在一家大学医院连续两个12个月期间接受胰腺手术的所有患者均纳入本回顾性队列分析。将使用脉搏轮廓自动血流动力学设备实施目标导向治疗(GDT,N = 45)的标准操作程序12个月后与使用该设备之前的类似时期(对照组,N = 31)在死亡率、住院时间和ICU住院时间、术后并发症以及液体和血管加压药的使用方面进行比较。
总体而言,分析了76例患者。GDT组使用的晶体液明显更少。接受GDT的患者严重并发症明显更少(肠吻合口漏:0例 vs. 5例(P = 0.0053);肾衰竭:0例 vs. 4例(P = 0.0133))。胰腺手术的死亡率为1例 vs. 3例患者(P = 0.142),重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间为4.38±3.63天 vs. 6.87±10.02天(P = 0.0964)。GDT组血液制品的使用明显更少。
在日常工作中使用与血流相关参数实施GDT的标准操作程序是可行的,并且与胰腺手术更好的结局相关。