Al-Angari Haitham M, Kimura Yoshitaka, Hadjileontiadis Leontios J, Khandoker Ahsan H
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and TechnologyAbu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
The Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku UniversitySendai, Japan.
Front Physiol. 2017 Aug 30;8:641. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00641. eCollection 2017.
Monitoring of fetal heart rate (FHR) is an important measure of fetal wellbeing during the months of pregnancy. Previous works on estimating FHR variability from Doppler ultrasound (DUS) signal mainly through autocorrelation analysis showed low accuracy when compared with heart rate variability (HRV) computed from fetal electrocardiography (fECG). In this work, we proposed a method based on empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and the kurtosis statistics to estimate FHR and its variability from DUS. Comparison between estimated beat-to-beat intervals using the proposed method and the autocorrelation function (AF) with respect to RR intervals computed from fECG as the ground truth was done on DUS signals from 44 pregnant mothers in the early (20 cases) and late (24 cases) gestational weeks. The new EMD-kurtosis method showed significant lower error in estimating the number of beats in the early group (EMD-kurtosis: 2.2% vs. AF: 8.5%, < 0.01, root mean squared error) and the late group (EMD-kurtosis: 2.9% vs. AF: 6.2%). The EMD-kurtosis method was also found to be better in estimating mean beat-to-beat with an average difference of 1.6 ms from true mean RR compared to 19.3 ms by using the AF method. However, the EMD-kurtosis performed worse than AF in estimating SNDD and RMSSD. The proposed EMD-kurtosis method is more robust than AF in low signal-to-noise ratio cases and can be used in a hybrid system to estimate beat-to-beat intervals from DUS. Further analysis to reduce the estimated beat-to-beat variability from the EMD-kurtosis method is needed.
监测胎儿心率(FHR)是孕期几个月中评估胎儿健康状况的一项重要措施。先前主要通过自相关分析从多普勒超声(DUS)信号估计FHR变异性的研究表明,与从胎儿心电图(fECG)计算出的心率变异性(HRV)相比,其准确性较低。在本研究中,我们提出了一种基于经验模态分解(EMD)和峰度统计的方法,用于从DUS估计FHR及其变异性。以从fECG计算出的RR间期作为参考标准,将使用所提出方法估计的逐搏间期与自相关函数(AF)进行比较,该比较基于44名怀孕母亲在孕早期(20例)和孕晚期(24例)的DUS信号进行。新的EMD-峰度方法在估计早期组(EMD-峰度:2.2% vs. AF:8.5%,<0.01,均方根误差)和晚期组(EMD-峰度:2.9% vs. AF:6.2%)的心跳次数时,误差显著更低。还发现EMD-峰度方法在估计平均逐搏间期方面表现更好,与AF方法相比,与真实平均RR的平均差异为1.6毫秒,而AF方法为19.3毫秒。然而,在估计标准化差值(SNDD)和均方根连续差值(RMSSD)方面,EMD-峰度方法的表现不如AF。所提出的EMD-峰度方法在低信噪比情况下比AF更稳健,可用于混合系统中从DUS估计逐搏间期。需要进一步分析以降低EMD-峰度方法估计的逐搏变异性。