Tyburski Ernest, Pełka-Wysiecka Justyna, Mak Monika, Samochowiec Agnieszka, Bieńkowski Przemysław, Samochowiec Jerzy
Department of Clinical Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of SzczecinSzczecin, Poland.
Department of Psychiatry, Pomeranian Medical UniversitySzczecin, Poland.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 30;8:1459. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01459. eCollection 2017.
Although it has been shown that there are more profound deficits present in deficit schizophrenia (DS) patients than in non-deficit schizophrenia (NDS) patients, there still remain some matters requiring further investigation. In this context, we formulated three research aims: (1) to compare executive functions between the investigated groups, (2) to determine the relationship between particular aspects of executive functions within the groups, and (3) to draw up a neuropsychological profile for executive functions. The study involved 148 schizophrenia patients divided into two groups on the basis of the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome: DS ( = 70) and NDS ( = 78). Patients were matched for sex, age, years of education, and overall cognitive functioning. For assessing executive functions we used the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), the Trail Making Test (TMT), the Phonemic Verbal Fluency Test (VFT P), the Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT), and the Go/No Go task (GNG). Deficit schizophrenia patients scored lower on the WCST and TMT (relative flexibility) than did the NDS patients. There were no inter-group differences in the VFT P, SCWT (relative inhibition), or GNG. There were significant correlations between WCST and TMT scores in both groups. The general neuropsychological profiles were similar in both groups. Deficit schizophrenia patients exhibited slightly greater interference with concept formation and non-verbal cognitive flexibility. Therefore, such problems may be specific to this particular type of schizophrenia. These results may be useful for the development of neuropsychological diagnostic methods for patients with schizophrenia.
尽管已有研究表明,缺损型精神分裂症(DS)患者存在比非缺损型精神分裂症(NDS)患者更严重的缺陷,但仍有一些问题需要进一步研究。在此背景下,我们制定了三个研究目标:(1)比较被调查组之间的执行功能;(2)确定组内执行功能各特定方面之间的关系;(3)制定执行功能的神经心理学概况。该研究纳入了148名精神分裂症患者,根据缺损综合征量表将其分为两组:DS组(n = 70)和NDS组(n = 78)。患者在性别、年龄、受教育年限和整体认知功能方面进行了匹配。为评估执行功能,我们使用了威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)、连线测验(TMT)、语音流畅性测验(VFT P)、斯特鲁普颜色和文字测验(SCWT)以及停止信号任务(GNG)。缺损型精神分裂症患者在WCST和TMT(相对灵活性)上的得分低于NDS患者。在VFT P、SCWT(相对抑制)或GNG方面,两组之间没有差异。两组中WCST和TMT得分之间均存在显著相关性。两组的一般神经心理学概况相似。缺损型精神分裂症患者在概念形成和非言语认知灵活性方面表现出稍大的干扰。因此,此类问题可能是这种特定类型精神分裂症所特有的。这些结果可能有助于为精神分裂症患者开发神经心理学诊断方法。