Rugani Rosa, Betti Sonia, Ceccarini Francesco, Sartori Luisa
Department of General Psychology, University of PadovaPadova, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2017 Aug 30;8:1481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01481. eCollection 2017.
In the past decade hand kinematics has been reliably adopted for investigating cognitive processes and disentangling debated topics. One of the most controversial issues in numerical cognition literature regards the origin - cultural vs. genetically driven - of the mental number line (MNL), oriented from left (small numbers) to right (large numbers). To date, the majority of studies have investigated this effect by means of response times, whereas studies considering more culturally unbiased measures such as kinematic parameters are rare. Here, we present a new paradigm that combines a "free response" task with the kinematic analysis of movement. Participants were seated in front of two little soccer goals placed on a table, one on the left and one on the right side. They were presented with left- or right-directed arrows and they were instructed to kick a small ball with their right index toward the goal indicated by the arrow. In a few test trials participants were presented also with a small (2) or a large (8) number, and they were allowed to choose the kicking direction. Participants performed more left responses with the small number and more right responses with the large number. The whole kicking movement was segmented in two temporal phases in order to make a hand kinematics' fine-grained analysis. The Kick Preparation and Kick Finalization phases were selected on the basis of peak trajectory deviation from the virtual midline between the two goals. Results show an effect of both small and large numbers on action execution timing. Participants were faster to finalize the action when responding to small numbers toward the left and to large number toward the right. Here, we provide the first experimental demonstration which highlights how numerical processing affects action execution in a new and not-overlearned context. The employment of this innovative and unbiased paradigm will permit to disentangle the role of nature and culture in shaping the direction of MNL and the role of finger in the acquisition of numerical skills. Last but not least, similar paradigms will allow to determine how cognition can influence action execution.
在过去十年中,手部运动学已被可靠地用于研究认知过程和厘清有争议的话题。数字认知文献中最具争议的问题之一是心理数字线(MNL)的起源——文化驱动还是基因驱动——心理数字线从左(小数)到右(大数)排列。迄今为止,大多数研究通过反应时间来研究这种效应,而考虑运动学参数等更具文化无偏性测量方法的研究很少。在此,我们提出一种新范式,将“自由反应”任务与运动的运动学分析相结合。参与者坐在桌子上放置的两个小足球门前面,一个在左边,一个在右边。向他们呈现向左或向右的箭头,并指示他们用右手食指将一个小球踢向箭头指示的球门。在一些测试试验中,也向参与者呈现一个小数字(2)或一个大数字(8),并允许他们选择踢球方向。参与者对小数字做出更多向左的反应,对大数字做出更多向右的反应。整个踢球动作被分为两个时间阶段,以便进行手部运动学的细粒度分析。根据轨迹峰值偏离两个球门之间虚拟中线的情况选择踢球准备阶段和踢球完成阶段。结果表明,小数和大数对动作执行时间均有影响。参与者在向左对小数字做出反应以及向右对大数字做出反应时,完成动作的速度更快。在此,我们提供了第一个实验证明,突出了数字处理在一个新的且未过度学习的情境中如何影响动作执行。采用这种创新且无偏的范式将有助于厘清天性和文化在塑造心理数字线方向中的作用以及手指在数字技能习得中的作用。最后但同样重要的是,类似的范式将有助于确定认知如何影响动作执行。