• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索空间数字反应编码联合效应、手指计数方向与具身认知之间的相互作用。

Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.

作者信息

Prete Giulia, Tommasi Luca

机构信息

Department of Psychological, Health and Territorial Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2020 May 12;8:e9155. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9155. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.9155
PMID:32435547
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7227642/
Abstract

The Spatial Numerical Association of Response Code (SNARC) is the preferential association between smaller/larger magnitudes and left/right side, respectively. Some evidence suggest a link between SNARC and a left-to-right finger counting habit. We asked 268 participants to show how they use the hands to count from 1 to 10. By means of this ecological task, 80% of the sample use first the right hand (to count from 1 to 5) and the majority of them use a palm-up posture. In Experiment 2 ( = 46) right-starters were asked to categorize 1-to-5 magnitudes as even or odd, using the left and right hand. Stimuli were presented both as Arabic numbers and by means of left and right hand photographs in palm-up and palm-down posture. Results confirmed the expected SNARC effect in the Arabic condition. With hand images we found that right hand responses were better for larger than for smaller magnitudes (SNARC, mainly for left hand palm-up stimuli), showing that the SNARC can be generalized to different codes. Finally, the interactions between magnitudes and left/right hand images in palm-up and palm-down posture suggest that embodied cognition can influence numerical processing.

摘要

反应编码的空间数字联合效应(SNARC)分别是较小/较大数值与左/右侧之间的优先联合。一些证据表明SNARC与从左到右的手指计数习惯之间存在联系。我们让268名参与者展示他们如何用手从1数到10。通过这项生态任务,80%的样本首先使用右手(从1数到5),并且他们中的大多数人采用掌心向上的姿势。在实验2(n = 46)中,要求从右手开始计数的人用左手和右手将1到5的数值分类为偶数或奇数。刺激以阿拉伯数字以及左手和右手掌心向上和掌心向下姿势的照片呈现。结果在阿拉伯数字条件下证实了预期的SNARC效应。对于手部图像,我们发现右手对较大数值的反应比对较小数值的反应更好(SNARC,主要针对左手掌心向上的刺激),这表明SNARC可以推广到不同的编码。最后,数值与掌心向上和掌心向下姿势的左手/右手图像之间的相互作用表明,具身认知可以影响数字处理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/1c67de79722b/peerj-08-9155-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/3ed069d31ed1/peerj-08-9155-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/6d22472249fa/peerj-08-9155-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/e39243450ec1/peerj-08-9155-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/b74a1f8f71f2/peerj-08-9155-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/1c67de79722b/peerj-08-9155-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/3ed069d31ed1/peerj-08-9155-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/6d22472249fa/peerj-08-9155-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/e39243450ec1/peerj-08-9155-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/b74a1f8f71f2/peerj-08-9155-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e957/7227642/1c67de79722b/peerj-08-9155-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.探索空间数字反应编码联合效应、手指计数方向与具身认知之间的相互作用。
PeerJ. 2020 May 12;8:e9155. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9155. eCollection 2020.
2
Unimanual SNARC Effect: Hand Matters.单手SNARC效应:手的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2011 Dec 23;2:372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00372. eCollection 2011.
3
No fingers, no SNARC? Neither the finger counting starting hand, nor its stability robustly affect the SNARC effect.无手指,无 SNARC?无论是起始手的手指计数,还是其稳定性都不会强烈影响 SNARC 效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Oct;230:103765. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103765. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
4
Contrasting left/right codes for response selection must not be necessarily associated with contrasting numerical features to get the SNARC.用于反应选择的左右编码对比不一定必须与数字特征对比相关联才能产生SNARC效应。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102887. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102887. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
5
The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space-number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants).16 年后的注意- SNARC 效应:在 174 名参与者中,没有自动的空间-数字联想(考虑到手指计数方式、意象生动度和学习方式)。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Oct;237(10):2633-2643. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05617-9. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
6
On the instability and constraints of the interaction between number representation and spatial attention in healthy humans: A concise review of the literature and new experimental evidence.关于健康人类数字表征与空间注意力交互作用的不稳定性和制约因素:文献综述及新实验证据简述
Prog Brain Res. 2016;227:223-56. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.04.023. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
7
How Deep Is Your SNARC? Interactions Between Numerical Magnitude, Response Hands, and Reachability in Peripersonal Space.你的空间数字反应关联效应有多深?数字大小、反应手与个人周边空间可达性之间的相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 1;9:622. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00622. eCollection 2018.
8
SNARC for numerosities is modulated by comparative instruction (and resembles some non-numerical effects).数字的空间数字反应编码联合效应受比较指令的调节(并且类似于一些非数字效应)。
Cogn Process. 2016 May;17(2):127-37. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0745-2. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
9
Cultural factors weaken but do not reverse left-to-right spatial biases in numerosity processing: Data from Arabic and English monoliterates and Arabic-English biliterates.文化因素削弱但不能逆转数量加工中的左-右空间偏向:来自阿拉伯语和英语单语者以及阿拉伯语-英语双语者的数据。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 16;16(12):e0261146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261146. eCollection 2021.
10
Spatial-numerical association of response code effect as a window to mental representation of magnitude in long-term memory among Hebrew-speaking children.空间-数字反应代码关联效应作为希伯来语儿童长期记忆中数量心理表象的窗口。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 May;181:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
One direction? Cultural aspects of the mental number line beyond reading direction.一个方向?心理数字线的文化方面超越了阅读方向。
Psychol Res. 2024 Dec 23;89(1):37. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02038-4.
2
The effect of aging and emotions on time processing.衰老和情绪对时间加工的影响。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Nov;35(11):2783-2795. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02563-z. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
3
Time reproduction, bisection and doubling: a novel paradigm to investigate the effect of the internal clock on time estimation.时间复制、二分和加倍:一种新的范式,用于研究内源性时钟对时间估计的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Explaining the SPoARC and SNARC effects with knowledge structures: An expertise account.用知识结构解释 SPoARC 和 SNARC 效应:专长观点。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):434-451. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01582-0.
2
The SNARC and MARC effects measured online: Large-scale assessment methods in flexible cognitive effects.在线测量的 SNARC 和 MARC 效应:灵活认知效应的大规模评估方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Aug;51(4):1676-1692. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01213-5.
3
A mental number line in human newborns.人类新生儿的心理数字线。
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1549-1559. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01745-0. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
Dev Sci. 2019 Nov;22(6):e12801. doi: 10.1111/desc.12801. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
4
A large-scale survey on finger counting routines, their temporal stability and flexibility in educated adults.一项关于受过教育的成年人手指计数习惯、其时间稳定性和灵活性的大规模调查。
PeerJ. 2018 Oct 31;6:e5878. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5878. eCollection 2018.
5
Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets.在没有听觉目标的情况下存在右耳优势的证据。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 22;8(1):15569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34086-3.
6
Embodied Interaction Priority: Other's Body Part Affects Numeral-Space Mappings.具身交互优先级:他人身体部位影响数字-空间映射。
Perception. 2018 May;47(5):492-506. doi: 10.1177/0301006618765556. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
7
Comparative cognition of number and space: the case of geometry and of the mental number line.数量和空间的比较认知:以几何和心理数字线为例。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;373(1740). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0120.
8
Mapping of non-numerical domains on space: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非数值域在空间上的映射:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Feb;236(2):335-346. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5154-6. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
9
Facial gender and hemispheric asymmetries: A hf-tRNS study.面部性别与半球不对称性:一项高频经颅随机噪声刺激研究。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):1145-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
10
Face gender categorization and hemispheric asymmetries: Contrasting evidence from connected and disconnected brains.面部性别分类与半球不对称性:来自连接和未连接大脑的对比证据。
Neuroscience. 2016 Dec 17;339:210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.021. Epub 2016 Oct 13.