• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器人辅助手术技术改善单髁膝关节置换术中关节线的恢复。

Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique.

作者信息

Herry Yannick, Batailler Cécile, Lording Timothy, Servien Elvire, Neyret Philippe, Lustig Sebastien

机构信息

Centre Albert-Trillat, CHU Lyon Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69004, Lyon, France.

Melbourne Orthopaedic Group, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2265-2271. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3633-9. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-017-3633-9
PMID:28913557
Abstract

PURPOSE

Joint-line restitution is one objective of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the joint line is often lowered when resurfacing femoral implants are used. The aim of this study was to compare the joint-line height in UKA performed by robotic-assisted and conventional techniques.

METHODS

This retrospective case-control study compared two matched groups of patients receiving a resurfacing UKA between 2013 and 2016 by either a robotic-assisted (n = 40) or conventional (n = 40) technique. Each group comprised 27 women and 13 menm wuth a mean age of 69 and 68 years, respectively. Indications for surgery were osteoarthritis (n = 35) and condylar osteonecrosis (n = 5). Two validated radiologic measurement methods were used to assess joint-line height.

RESULTS

Forty UKA (23 medial and 17 lateral) were analysed in each group. Restitution of joint-line height was significantly improved in the robotic-assisted group compared than the control group: +1.4 mm ±2.6 vs +4.7 mm ± 2.4 (p < 0.05) as assessed using method 1, and +1.5 mm ±2.3 vs +4.6 mm ±2.5 (p < 0.05) as assessed using method 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Restitution of joint-line height in resurfacing UKA can be improved with robotic-assisted surgery. Improvement in clinical outcome measures must be demonstrated with long-term studies.

摘要

目的

关节线恢复是单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)的一个目标。然而,使用股骨表面置换植入物时,关节线常降低。本研究的目的是比较机器人辅助技术和传统技术进行单髁膝关节置换术时的关节线高度。

方法

这项回顾性病例对照研究比较了2013年至2016年间接受表面置换单髁膝关节置换术的两组匹配患者,一组采用机器人辅助技术(n = 40),另一组采用传统技术(n = 40)。每组包括27名女性和13名男性,平均年龄分别为69岁和68岁。手术适应症为骨关节炎(n = 35)和髁部骨坏死(n = 5)。使用两种经过验证的放射学测量方法评估关节线高度。

结果

每组分析了40例单髁膝关节置换术(23例内侧和17例外侧)。与对照组相比,机器人辅助组的关节线高度恢复明显改善:使用方法1评估时为+1.4 mm±2.6 vs +4.7 mm±2.4(p < 0.05),使用方法2评估时为+1.5 mm±2.3 vs +4.6 mm±2.5(p < 0.05)。

结论

机器人辅助手术可改善表面置换单髁膝关节置换术的关节线高度恢复。长期研究必须证明临床结局指标的改善情况。

相似文献

1
Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique.使用机器人辅助手术技术改善单髁膝关节置换术中关节线的恢复。
Int Orthop. 2017 Nov;41(11):2265-2271. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3633-9. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术可改善植入物位置,降低翻修率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1232-1240. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5081-5. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
3
Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees.与传统单髁膝关节置换术相比,内侧无图像机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术具有更高的准确性和植入物存活率:对连续356例膝关节进行2至11年的随访。
Int Orthop. 2023 Feb;47(2):533-541. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05640-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
Robotic-Arm-Assisted vs Conventional Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. The 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助臂与传统单髁膝关节置换术的比较。一项随机对照试验的 2 年临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S109-S115. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.050. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
5
The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术的学习曲线:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1033-1042. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2018-0040.R1.
6
Outcomes of robotic-arm-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: minimum 3-year follow-up.机器人手臂辅助内侧单髁膝关节置换术的疗效:至少3年随访
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Aug;29(6):1305-1311. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02424-4. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
7
Is robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a safe procedure? A case control study.机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术安全吗?一项病例对照研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Mar;29(3):931-938. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06051-z. Epub 2020 May 10.
8
The three-year survivorship of robotically assisted versus non-robotically assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助与非机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术的三年生存率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Mar;102-B(3):319-328. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-0713.R1.
9
Clinical results and short-term survivorship of robotic-arm-assisted medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.机器人辅助内侧和外侧单间室膝关节置换术的临床结果和短期生存率。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1551-1559. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05566-4. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
10
Survivorship and patient satisfaction of robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum two-year follow-up.机器人辅助内侧单髁膝关节置换术至少两年随访的生存率和患者满意度
Knee. 2017 Mar;24(2):419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2016.12.001. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved accuracy of functional alignment restoration with robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty : A quasi-randomized controlled trial.机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中功能对线恢复准确性的提高:一项半随机对照试验。
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1007/s00132-025-04711-x.
2
Robotic-Assisted Joint Line Preserving Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Positioning Among Octogenarians.八旬老人中机器人辅助保留关节线的单髁膝关节置换术的定位
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 8;15(8):362. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080362.
3
Is Native Joint Line More Accurately Restored with Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty than with Conventional Instruments?
与传统器械相比,机器人辅助全膝关节置换术能否更准确地恢复原生关节线?
J Orthop Case Rep. 2025 Feb;15(2):233-238. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i02.5294.
4
Robotic Assistance in Simultaneous Bilateral Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 126 Knees Demonstrating Enhanced Radiographic Accuracy and Comparable Safety to Conventional Methods.机器人辅助在同期双侧内侧单髁膝关节置换术中的应用:一项对126例膝关节的回顾性队列研究,结果显示与传统方法相比,其影像学准确性更高且安全性相当。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jan 21;31:101594. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101594. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Comparative analysis of short-term efficacy between robot-assisted retrograde drilling and arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.机器人辅助逆行钻孔与关节镜下微骨折治疗距骨骨软骨损伤的短期疗效比较分析
Front Surg. 2024 May 27;11:1404513. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1404513. eCollection 2024.
6
The evolution of robotics: research and application progress of dental implant robotic systems.机器人技术的演进:牙科植入物机器人系统的研究与应用进展。
Int J Oral Sci. 2024 Apr 8;16(1):28. doi: 10.1038/s41368-024-00296-x.
7
[Evolving indications for partial knee replacement : New aspects].[膝关节部分置换术不断变化的适应证:新进展]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024 Apr;53(4):238-245. doi: 10.1007/s00132-024-04484-9. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
8
Does robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restore native joint line more accurately than with conventional instruments?机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术比传统器械更能准确恢复自然关节线吗?
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jan 22;18(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01789-3.
9
High return to sport rate in patients undergoing image-based robotic arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.行基于影像的机器人辅助单髁膝关节置换术患者的高运动回归率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4037-4044. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05141-0. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
10
Learning curve for robot-assisted knee arthroplasty; optimizing the learning curve to improve efficiency.机器人辅助膝关节置换术的学习曲线;优化学习曲线以提高效率。
Biomed Eng Lett. 2023 Aug 21;13(4):515-521. doi: 10.1007/s13534-023-00311-w. eCollection 2023 Nov.