Winkelmann Nils, Schäfer Vivien, Rinke Jenny, Kaiser Alexander, Ernst Philipp, Scholl Sebastian, Hochhaus Andreas, Ernst Thomas
Abteilung Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;143(12):2511-2519. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2518-z. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
SETBP1 mutations have been established as a diagnostic marker in myeloid malignancies and are associated with inferior survival. Since there is limited data on their clinical impact and stability during disease progression, we sought to investigate the relationship between SETBP1 mutations and disease evolution.
Bidirectional Sanger sequencing of the SETBP1 gene was performed for 442 unselected patients with World Health Organization (WHO) defined myeloid disorders. Follow-up analysis was performed on samples from 123/442 patients to investigate SETBP1 mutation dynamics. Targeted deep next-generation sequencing for a panel of 30 leukemia-associated genes was established to study SETBP1 cooperating mutations.
10/442 patients (2.3%) had SETBP1 hotspot mutations (MDS/MPN, n = 7, sAML, n = 3), whereas four patients (1%) had SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations (MPN, n = 1; MDS, n = 2; sAML, n = 1). The median overall survival for patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations, SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations, and SETBP1 wild type was 14 (range 0-31), 50 (range 0-71), and 47 months (range 0-402), respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, SETBP1 hotspot mutations were significantly associated with reduced overall survival compared to SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations and the SETBP1 wild type (p < 0.001). All 10 patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations died from relapse or disease progression. Three of four patients with SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations are alive with stable disease. Cooperating CSF3R and TET2 mutations were most frequently observed in patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations.
Patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations suffered from aggressive disease with rapid evolution and inferior overall survival. Patients with SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations had less aggressive disease and a more favorable prognosis. Diagnostic screens for SETBP1 hotspot mutations may help identifying this dismal patient group and treat them in multicenter clinical studies.
SETBP1突变已被确立为髓系恶性肿瘤的诊断标志物,且与较差的生存率相关。由于关于其在疾病进展过程中的临床影响和稳定性的数据有限,我们试图研究SETBP1突变与疾病演变之间的关系。
对442例未经选择的世界卫生组织(WHO)定义的髓系疾病患者进行SETBP1基因的双向桑格测序。对123/442例患者的样本进行随访分析,以研究SETBP1突变动态。建立了针对一组30个白血病相关基因的靶向深度二代测序,以研究SETBP1协同突变。
10/442例患者(2.3%)有SETBP1热点突变(骨髓增生异常综合征/骨髓增殖性肿瘤,n = 7,继发性急性髓系白血病,n = 3),而4例患者(1%)有SETBP1非热点突变(骨髓增殖性肿瘤,n = 1;骨髓增生异常综合征,n = 2;继发性急性髓系白血病,n = 1)。SETBP1热点突变患者、SETBP1非热点突变患者和SETBP1野生型患者的中位总生存期分别为14个月(范围0 - 31个月)、50个月(范围0 - 71个月)和47个月(范围0 - 402个月)。在卡普兰 - 迈耶分析中,与SETBP1非热点突变和SETBP1野生型相比,SETBP1热点突变与总生存期降低显著相关(p < 0.001)。所有10例SETBP1热点突变患者均死于复发或疾病进展。4例SETBP1非热点突变患者中有3例病情稳定存活。SETBP1热点突变患者中最常观察到协同的CSF3R和TET2突变。
SETBP1热点突变患者患有侵袭性疾病,进展迅速且总生存期较差。SETBP1非热点突变患者的疾病侵袭性较小,预后较好。对SETBP1热点突变进行诊断筛查可能有助于识别这一预后不良的患者群体,并在多中心临床研究中对他们进行治疗。