Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Diabetes Centre, 193 Hathersage Road, Central Manchester University hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 0JE, UK.
Diabetologia. 2018 Jan;61(1):43-47. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4421-1. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
In the Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk of Cardiovascular Events (DEVOTE), insulin degludec was non-inferior to insulin glargine in terms of cardiovascular events and mortality. However, there were lower rates of severe hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec. DEVOTE investigators now extend these findings by presenting the results of two observational epidemiological analyses based on trial data. In the first of these analyses (DEVOTE 2), Zinman et al (Diabetologia DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4423-z ) demonstrate that, compared with individuals with lower day-to-day fasting glycaemic variability, those with higher day-to-day fasting glycaemic variability had a similar risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) but a higher risk of severe hypoglycaemia and all-cause mortality. In the second analysis (DEVOTE 3), Pieber et al (Diabetologia DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4422-0 ) found that individuals who experienced severe hypoglycaemia had a similar risk of MACE compared with those who never experienced severe hypoglycaemia, but had a more than twofold higher risk of subsequent total mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. The strengths of these studies relate to the availability of high-quality prospective data on adjudicated severe hypoglycaemia, MACE and mortality events in a large number of high-risk insulin-treated individuals with type 2 diabetes. Limitations include the observational nature of the data and thus residual confounding remains possible. Furthermore, the short duration of the trial resulted in limited statistical power for some analyses. Therefore, whilst DEVOTE 2 and DEVOTE 3 raise awareness of the mortality risks associated with glucose variability and severe hypoglycaemia in high-risk, insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, they cannot clarify causal relationships. Preventing severe hypoglycaemia in those with type 2 diabetes should already be a priority in clinical practice. However, findings from future clinical trials are needed to guide physicians on whether it is beneficial to target glucose variability, and risk for severe hypoglycaemia, to reduce the risks for CVD events and mortality in these individuals.
在比较 2 型糖尿病高危心血管事件患者中胰岛素 Degludec 与胰岛素 Glargine 的心血管安全性的临床试验(DEVOTE)中,胰岛素 Degludec 在心血管事件和死亡率方面不劣于胰岛素 Glargine。然而,胰岛素 Degludec 的严重低血糖发生率较低。DEVOTE 研究人员现在通过呈现基于试验数据的两项观察性流行病学分析结果来扩展这些发现。在这些分析中的第一项(DEVOTE 2)中,Zinman 等人(糖尿病学 DOI:10.1007/s00125-017-4423-z)表明,与日常空腹血糖变异性较低的个体相比,日常空腹血糖变异性较高的个体发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的风险相似,但严重低血糖和全因死亡率的风险更高。在第二项分析(DEVOTE 3)中,Pieber 等人(糖尿病学 DOI:10.1007/s00125-017-4422-0)发现,经历严重低血糖的个体与从未经历严重低血糖的个体相比,发生 MACE 的风险相似,但随后的总死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率的风险高出两倍多。这些研究的优势在于,在大量 2 型糖尿病高危胰岛素治疗患者中,可获得高质量的关于严重低血糖、MACE 和死亡率事件的前瞻性数据。局限性包括数据的观察性质,因此仍然存在残余混杂。此外,试验的持续时间较短,导致一些分析的统计效力有限。因此,尽管 DEVOTE 2 和 DEVOTE 3 提高了人们对高风险、胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者中葡萄糖变异性和严重低血糖相关死亡风险的认识,但它们不能澄清因果关系。预防 2 型糖尿病患者发生严重低血糖应该已经是临床实践的优先事项。然而,需要未来的临床试验结果来指导医生,是否针对葡萄糖变异性和严重低血糖的目标,以降低这些个体发生 CVD 事件和死亡率的风险是有益的。