• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《睡眠体位训练器对比口腔矫治器治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效持久性:一项随机对照试验的 12 个月随访》

Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, OLVG West, Jan Tooropstraat 164 1061 AE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2018 May;22(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4
PMID:28913630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5918490/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Sleep Position Trainer (SPT) is a new option for treating patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA). This study investigated long-term efficacy, adherence, and quality of life during use of the SPT device compared with oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with POSA.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter trial randomized patients with mild to moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 5-30/h) to SPT or OAT. Polysomnography was performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months' follow-up. The primary endpoint was OSA severity; adherence, quality of life, and adverse events were also assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were randomized and 58 completed the study (29 in each group). Median AHI in the SPT group decreased from 13.2/h at baseline to 7.1/h after 12 months (P < 0.001); corresponding values in the OAT group were 13.4/h and 5.0/h (P < 0.001), with no significant between-group difference (P = 1.000). Improvements throughout the study were maintained at 12 months. Long-term median adherence was also similar in the two treatment groups; the proportion of patients who used their device for ≥ 4 h for 5 days in a week was 100% in the SPT group and 97.0% in the OAT group (P = 0.598).

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of SPT therapy was maintained over 12 months and was comparable to that of OAT in patients with mild to moderate POSA. Adherence was relatively high, and similar in the two groups.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02045576).

摘要

目的

睡眠体位训练器(SPT)是治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)患者的一种新选择。本研究比较了 SPT 装置与口腔矫正器治疗(OAT)在治疗 POSA 患者时的长期疗效、依从性和使用期间的生活质量。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心试验,将轻度至中度 POSA(呼吸暂停低通气指数 [AHI] 5-30/h)患者随机分为 SPT 或 OAT 组。基线时和 3 个月及 12 个月随访时进行多导睡眠图检查。主要终点是 OSA 严重程度;同时评估依从性、生活质量和不良事件。

结果

99 例患者被随机分组,58 例完成研究(每组 29 例)。SPT 组的中位 AHI 从基线时的 13.2/h 下降到 12 个月时的 7.1/h(P<0.001);OAT 组相应的数值分别为 13.4/h 和 5.0/h(P<0.001),两组间无显著差异(P=1.000)。整个研究过程中的改善在 12 个月时得以维持。两种治疗组的长期中位依从性也相似;SPT 组中每周使用设备 5 天、每天使用≥4 小时的患者比例为 100%,OAT 组为 97.0%(P=0.598)。

结论

SPT 治疗的疗效在 12 个月内得以维持,在轻度至中度 POSA 患者中与 OAT 相当。依从性相对较高,两组间无差异。

试验注册

www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02045576)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/f537a9321ec3/11325_2017_1568_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/cbb8eca1a7b1/11325_2017_1568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/97375c9450c7/11325_2017_1568_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/3e55ebe30427/11325_2017_1568_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/f537a9321ec3/11325_2017_1568_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/cbb8eca1a7b1/11325_2017_1568_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/97375c9450c7/11325_2017_1568_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/3e55ebe30427/11325_2017_1568_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aad8/5918490/f537a9321ec3/11325_2017_1568_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.《睡眠体位训练器对比口腔矫治器治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效持久性:一项随机对照试验的 12 个月随访》
Sleep Breath. 2018 May;22(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
2
A randomized, controlled trial of positional therapy versus oral appliance therapy for position-dependent sleep apnea.一项针对体位性睡眠呼吸暂停的体位治疗与口腔矫治器治疗的随机对照试验。
Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
3
Effects of the combination of novel eye mask sleep position therapy device and oral appliance on positional OSA: A multi-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.新型眼罩睡眠体位治疗装置联合口腔矫治器治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的多臂平行组随机对照研究。
Sleep Med. 2023 Feb;102:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.12.017. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
4
A stepwise titration protocol for oral appliance therapy in positional obstructive sleep apnea patients: proof of concept.用于体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者口腔矫治器治疗的逐步滴定方案:概念验证
Sleep Breath. 2020 Sep;24(3):1229-1236. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02045-w. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
5
NightBalance Sleep Position Treatment Device Versus Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.夜眠平衡睡眠体位治疗装置与自动调节正压通气治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的比较。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Jul 15;15(7):947-956. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7868.
6
Long-term effectiveness and compliance of positional therapy with the sleep position trainer in the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.睡眠姿势训练器体位治疗对体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的长期疗效及依从性
Sleep. 2014 Jul 1;37(7):1209-15. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3840.
7
Positional therapy in patients with residual positional obstructive sleep apnea after upper airway surgery.上气道手术后残留体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的体位治疗
Sleep Breath. 2017 May;21(2):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s11325-016-1397-x. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
8
Oral Appliance Therapy in Patients With Daytime Sleepiness and Snoring or Mild to Moderate Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口腔矫治器治疗日间嗜睡和打鼾或轻中度睡眠呼吸暂停患者的随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1278-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2051.
9
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of customized maxillary oral appliance with mandibular advancement appliance as a treatment modality for moderate obstructive sleep apnea patients-a randomized controlled trial.比较研究定制式上颌口腔矫治器与下颌前伸矫治器治疗中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Feb 1;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-07054-6.
10
The outcome of oral appliance therapy on position-dependent obstructive sleep apnea: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.口腔矫治器治疗与体位相关的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的效果:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Sep;162(3):386-393. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.04.029. Epub 2022 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative efficacy of sleep positional therapy, oral appliance therapy, and CPAP in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis of mean changes in key outcomes.睡眠体位疗法、口腔矫治器疗法和持续气道正压通气治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的比较疗效:关键结局平均变化的荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 3;12:1517274. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1517274. eCollection 2025.
2
Oral appliance therapy vs. positional therapy for managing positional obstructive sleep apnea; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.口腔矫正器治疗与体位治疗在管理体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04277-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A randomized, controlled trial of positional therapy versus oral appliance therapy for position-dependent sleep apnea.一项针对体位性睡眠呼吸暂停的体位治疗与口腔矫治器治疗的随机对照试验。
Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population: A systematic review.普通人群中阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的患病率:系统评价。
Sleep Med Rev. 2017 Aug;34:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Maxillomandibular Advancement for Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Meta-analysis.
Indications for Dental Specialists for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Mandibular Advancement Devices: A Narrative Review.
牙科专家使用下颌前移装置治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的适应症:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Dent. 2024 Mar 31;2024:1007237. doi: 10.1155/2024/1007237. eCollection 2024.
4
Large variability in definitions of sleep apnea indices used in clinical studies.临床研究中使用的睡眠呼吸暂停指数定义存在很大差异。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Mar 1;20(3):461-468. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10918.
5
Effects of mandibular advancement devices on upper airway dimensions in obstructive sleep apnea: responders versus non-responders.下颌前伸装置对上气道尺寸在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的影响:应答者与无应答者。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5649-5660. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05186-w. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
6
Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.两种可调节下颌前伸装置对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者呼吸参数和上呼吸道尺寸影响的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2013-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04945-z. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
7
International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.国际阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停共识声明。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Jul;13(7):1061-1482. doi: 10.1002/alr.23079. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
European Respiratory Society guideline on non-CPAP therapies for obstructive sleep apnoea.欧洲呼吸学会阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停非 CPAP 疗法指南。
Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Nov 30;30(162). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0200-2021. Print 2021 Dec 31.
9
Standardized framework to report on the role of sleeping position in sleep apnea patients.用于报告睡眠呼吸暂停患者睡眠体位作用的标准化框架。
Sleep Breath. 2021 Dec;25(4):1717-1728. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02255-2. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
10
Positional Sleep Apnea Among Regional and Remote Australian Population and Simulated Positional Treatment Effects.澳大利亚偏远地区人群中的体位性睡眠呼吸暂停及模拟体位治疗效果
Nat Sci Sleep. 2020 Dec 4;12:1123-1135. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S286403. eCollection 2020.
上颌下颌前移术治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:一项荟萃分析
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;142(1):58-66. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2678.
4
A custom-made mandibular repositioning device for obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome: the ORCADES study.一种用于阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的定制下颌重新定位装置:ORCADES研究
Sleep Med. 2016 Mar;19:131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
5
Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study.普通人群中睡眠呼吸紊乱的患病率:HypnoLaus 研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Apr;3(4):310-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
6
Sleep position trainer versus tennis ball technique in positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.睡眠体位训练器与网球技术治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的比较
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Jan 15;11(2):139-47. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4460.
7
Long-term effectiveness and compliance of positional therapy with the sleep position trainer in the treatment of positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.睡眠姿势训练器体位治疗对体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征的长期疗效及依从性
Sleep. 2014 Jul 1;37(7):1209-15. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3840.
8
Upper-airway stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea.上气道刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Jan 9;370(2):139-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308659.
9
Objectively measured vs self-reported compliance during oral appliance therapy for sleep-disordered breathing.客观测量与自我报告的口腔矫治器治疗睡眠呼吸障碍的依从性比较。
Chest. 2013 Nov;144(5):1495-1502. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-0613.
10
The sleep position trainer: a new treatment for positional obstructive sleep apnoea.睡眠姿势训练器:治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的新方法。
Sleep Breath. 2013 May;17(2):771-9. doi: 10.1007/s11325-012-0764-5. Epub 2012 Aug 25.