• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对体位性睡眠呼吸暂停的体位治疗与口腔矫治器治疗的随机对照试验。

A randomized, controlled trial of positional therapy versus oral appliance therapy for position-dependent sleep apnea.

作者信息

Benoist Linda, de Ruiter Maurits, de Lange Jan, de Vries Nico

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, OLVG West, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oral Kinesiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024
PMID:28522078
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of positional therapy (PT) with the sleep position trainer (SPT) to oral appliance therapy (OAT) in patients with mild-to-moderate positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA).

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients with mild-to-moderate POSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 ≤ 30/hour sleep) were randomized for PT or OAT. Polysomnography was repeated after 3 months. Efficacy, adherence, mean disease alleviation (MDA), quality of life, dropouts and adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 177 patients were screened for the study; 99 underwent randomization and 81 completed the study. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis of median [IQR] AHI showed a reduction in the PT group from 13.0 [9.7-18.5] to 7.0 [3.8-12.8], p < 0.001 and in the OAT group from 11.7 [9.0-16.2] to 9.1 [4.9-11.7], p < 0.001. Mean adherence (≥4 h/night, ≥5 days/week) was 89.3 ± 22.4% for SPT versus 81.3 ± 30.0% in OAT patients, p = 0.208.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral appliance therapy and positional therapy were equally effective in reducing the median AHI in patients with mild-to-moderate POSA. The results of this study have important implications for future OSA treatment guidelines and daily clinical practice. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV NUMBER

NCT02045576.

摘要

目的

比较体位疗法(PT)联合睡眠体位训练器(SPT)与口腔矫治器疗法(OAT)治疗轻至中度体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)患者的疗效。

方法

多中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。轻至中度POSA(呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5且≤30次/小时睡眠)患者被随机分为PT组或OAT组。3个月后重复进行多导睡眠图检查。评估疗效、依从性、平均疾病缓解率(MDA)、生活质量、退出研究情况和不良事件。

结果

共177例患者被纳入本研究筛查;99例患者进行了随机分组,81例完成了研究。意向性分析(ITT)中,PT组的AHI中位数[四分位间距]从13.0[9.7 - 18.5]降至7.0[3.8 - 12.8],p < 0.001;OAT组从11.7[9.0 - 16.2]降至9.1[4.9 - 11.7],p < 0.001。SPT组的平均依从性(≥4小时/晚,≥5天/周)为89.3±22.4%,OAT组患者为81.3±30.0%,p = 0.208。

结论

口腔矫治器疗法和体位疗法在降低轻至中度POSA患者的AHI中位数方面同样有效。本研究结果对未来阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)治疗指南及日常临床实践具有重要意义。临床试验注册号:NCT02045576。

相似文献

1
A randomized, controlled trial of positional therapy versus oral appliance therapy for position-dependent sleep apnea.一项针对体位性睡眠呼吸暂停的体位治疗与口腔矫治器治疗的随机对照试验。
Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.01.024. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Durability of treatment effects of the Sleep Position Trainer versus oral appliance therapy in positional OSA: 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.《睡眠体位训练器对比口腔矫治器治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的疗效持久性:一项随机对照试验的 12 个月随访》
Sleep Breath. 2018 May;22(2):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1568-4. Epub 2017 Sep 15.
3
Effects of the combination of novel eye mask sleep position therapy device and oral appliance on positional OSA: A multi-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial.新型眼罩睡眠体位治疗装置联合口腔矫治器治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的多臂平行组随机对照研究。
Sleep Med. 2023 Feb;102:52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.12.017. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
4
Positional therapy in patients with residual positional obstructive sleep apnea after upper airway surgery.上气道手术后残留体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的体位治疗
Sleep Breath. 2017 May;21(2):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s11325-016-1397-x. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
5
Oral Appliance Therapy in Patients With Daytime Sleepiness and Snoring or Mild to Moderate Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Clinical Trial.口腔矫治器治疗日间嗜睡和打鼾或轻中度睡眠呼吸暂停患者的随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Aug;175(8):1278-85. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2051.
6
A stepwise titration protocol for oral appliance therapy in positional obstructive sleep apnea patients: proof of concept.用于体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者口腔矫治器治疗的逐步滴定方案:概念验证
Sleep Breath. 2020 Sep;24(3):1229-1236. doi: 10.1007/s11325-020-02045-w. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
7
NightBalance Sleep Position Treatment Device Versus Auto-Adjusting Positive Airway Pressure for Treatment of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea.夜眠平衡睡眠体位治疗装置与自动调节正压通气治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的比较。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Jul 15;15(7):947-956. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7868.
8
Use of bibloc and monobloc oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnoea: a multicentre, randomized, blinded, parallel-group equivalence trial.双块式和单块式口腔矫治器在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的应用:一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组等效性试验。
Eur J Orthod. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):80-88. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy030.
9
Minimizing the mandibular advancement in an oral appliance for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea.在用于治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的口腔矫治器中尽量减少下颌前伸。
Sleep Med. 2017 Jun;34:226-231. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2016.12.019. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
10
Oral appliance therapy vs. positional therapy for managing positional obstructive sleep apnea; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.口腔矫正器治疗与体位治疗在管理体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04277-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Positional Therapy: A Real Opportunity in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea? An Update from the Literature.体位治疗:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停治疗的真正契机?文献综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;15(8):1175. doi: 10.3390/life15081175.
2
Exploring the Effects of Tirzepatide on Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Literature Review.探索替尔泊肽对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的影响:一项文献综述。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 6;17(3):e80164. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80164. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Oral Health Implications of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Literature Review.阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的口腔健康影响:文献综述
Biomedicines. 2024 Jun 21;12(7):1382. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12071382.
4
Oral appliance therapy vs. positional therapy for managing positional obstructive sleep apnea; a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials.口腔矫正器治疗与体位治疗在管理体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停中的比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 7;24(1):666. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04277-8.
5
Impacts of conservative treatment on the clinical manifestations of obstructive sleep apnea-systematic review and meta-analysis.保守治疗对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停临床表现的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sleep Breath. 2024 Aug;28(4):1563-1574. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03034-z. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
6
Indications for Dental Specialists for Treating Obstructive Sleep Apnea with Mandibular Advancement Devices: A Narrative Review.牙科专家使用下颌前移装置治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的适应症:一项叙述性综述。
Int J Dent. 2024 Mar 31;2024:1007237. doi: 10.1155/2024/1007237. eCollection 2024.
7
Sleep Apnea Syndrome (SAS) Clinical Practice Guidelines 2020.《2020年睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(SAS)临床实践指南》
Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2022 Jan 3;20(1):5-37. doi: 10.1007/s41105-021-00353-6. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Patient compliance and satisfaction with a new forehead device for positional obstructive sleep apnoea treatment: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial.患者对新型额部装置治疗体位性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的依从性和满意度:一项随机对照试验的事后分析。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Jun;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001503.
9
Efficacy of vibrotactile positional therapy devices on patients with positional obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.振动触觉位置疗法设备治疗位置性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorax. 2023 Nov;78(11):1126-1134. doi: 10.1136/thorax-2021-218402. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
10
Comparisons of the effects of two types of titratable mandibular advancement devices on respiratory parameters and upper airway dimensions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial.两种可调节下颌前伸装置对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者呼吸参数和上呼吸道尺寸影响的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2013-2025. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04945-z. Epub 2023 Mar 17.