• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证美国癌症联合委员会(第 8 版)对 III 期胃癌患者的修改:来自专门的东部中心的大型系列的生存分析。

Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.

机构信息

Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Department of General Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

Cancer Med. 2017 Oct;6(10):2179-2187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1118. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1002/cam4.1118
PMID:28913982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5633559/
Abstract

The 8th edition of the TNM was released in 2016 and included major revisions, especially for stage III. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC TNM classification for stage III gastric cancer. Clinical data from 1557 patients operated on for stage III gastric cancer according to the 7th edition between 2007 and 2014 were analyzed and compared using the 7th and 8th TNM classifications. A proposed staging system was established, and the three systems were compared in terms of prognostic performance. The stage shifted for 669 (42.96%) patients. It shifted from IIIA to IIIB (one patient, 0.06%), IIIB to IIIA (230 patients, 14.8%), IIIB to IIIC (94 patients, 6.0%), and IIIC to IIIB (344 patients, 22.1%). However, the new AJCC subgroupings did not prove distinctive for survival levels between T3N3aM0 (stage IIIB) and T3N3bM0 (stage IIIC) or between T4aN3aM0 (stage IIIB) and T4aN3bM0 (stage IIIC) when <30 lymph nodes (LNs) were resected. The performance of the 8th edition (c-index, 0.614; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.596-0.633) revealed no relevant improvement compared to the 7th edition (c-index, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.605-0.643). The proposed staging system generated the best prognostic stratification. The 8th TNM edition may not provide better accuracy in predicting the prognosis of stage III gastric cancer. The proposed staging system, comprised of a combination of the number of LNs harvested and the 7th and 8th AJCC classifications, may improve predictive capacities for stage III gastric cancer.

摘要

第八版 TNM 于 2016 年发布,其中包含了重大修订,特别是对于 III 期。我们旨在比较第七版和第八版 AJCC TNM 分期系统在 III 期胃癌中的预后价值。分析了 2007 年至 2014 年间根据第七版 AJCC 分期标准接受 III 期胃癌手术的 1557 例患者的临床资料,并使用第七版和第八版 TNM 分类进行比较。建立了一个分期系统,并比较了这三个系统在预后性能方面的差异。669 例(42.96%)患者的分期发生了变化。从 IIIA 期变为 IIIB 期(1 例,0.06%),从 IIIB 期变为 IIIA 期(230 例,14.8%),从 IIIB 期变为 IIIC 期(94 例,6.0%),从 IIIC 期变为 IIIB 期(344 例,22.1%)。然而,当<30 个淋巴结(LN)被切除时,新的 AJCC 亚组对于 T3N3aM0(III 期)和 T3N3bM0(IIIC 期)或 T4aN3aM0(III 期)和 T4aN3bM0(IIIC 期)之间的生存水平没有明显的区别。与第七版(c-index,0.624;95%置信区间[CI],0.605-0.643)相比,第八版(c-index,0.614;95%CI,0.596-0.633)的表现没有明显的改善。提出的分期系统产生了最佳的预后分层。第八版 TNM 可能无法提供更准确的预测 III 期胃癌的预后。由 LN 数量和第七版和第八版 AJCC 分类组成的提出的分期系统可能会提高 III 期胃癌的预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/69a5cc62b98f/CAM4-6-2179-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/b7a61c7f4cb2/CAM4-6-2179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/e378654fb784/CAM4-6-2179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/dee0bfba635a/CAM4-6-2179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/0fe9bfb2de0e/CAM4-6-2179-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/69a5cc62b98f/CAM4-6-2179-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/b7a61c7f4cb2/CAM4-6-2179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/e378654fb784/CAM4-6-2179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/dee0bfba635a/CAM4-6-2179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/0fe9bfb2de0e/CAM4-6-2179-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6ef/5633559/69a5cc62b98f/CAM4-6-2179-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th edition) changes for patients with stage III gastric cancer: survival analysis of a large series from a Specialized Eastern Center.验证美国癌症联合委员会(第 8 版)对 III 期胃癌患者的修改:来自专门的东部中心的大型系列的生存分析。
Cancer Med. 2017 Oct;6(10):2179-2187. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1118. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.改良的第八版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)胃癌TNM系统的外部验证:中国南方的长期结果
Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
3
Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.评估第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统:来自中国单机构研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1918-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2206-1. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
4
Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.提出并验证了一种改良的分期系统,以提高第 8 版 AJCC/UICC pTNM 分期系统对胃腺癌预后预测性能:一项多中心研究及外部验证。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 Nov 19;38(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0337-5.
5
The effectiveness of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: A comparative study between the 7th and 8th editions.美国癌症联合委员会第8版TNM分类在胃癌患者预后评估中的有效性:第7版与第8版的比较研究
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;43(12):2349-2356. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
6
Comparing prognostic values of the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer.比较第 7 版和第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会 TNM 分期系统在胃癌预后评估中的价值。
Int J Biol Markers. 2020 Mar;35(1):26-32. doi: 10.1177/1724600819891585. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Comparison of the 7th and 8th editions of the American joint committee on cancer TNM classification for patients with stage III gastric cancer.美国癌症联合委员会第7版和第8版胃癌TNM分期对Ⅲ期胃癌患者的比较。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 6;8(48):83555-83562. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18375. eCollection 2017 Oct 13.
8
The 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis staging system for gastric cancer is superior to the 7th edition: results from a Chinese mono-institutional study of 1663 patients.第八版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌肿瘤-淋巴结-转移分期系统优于第七版:来自中国单机构 1663 例患者的研究结果。
Gastric Cancer. 2018 Jul;21(4):643-652. doi: 10.1007/s10120-017-0779-5. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
9
Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database.基于国家癌症数据库验证第 8 版 AJCC TNM 胃癌分期系统。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3683-3691. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6078-x. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
10
Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.比较新旧(第 6 版和第 7 版)TNM 分类在晚期胃癌中的分期。
Anticancer Res. 2011 Jun;31(6):2361-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Multicenter Validation Study of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (8th Edition) for Gastric Cancer: Proposal for a Simplified and Improved TNM Staging System.美国国立综合癌症网络(第8版)胃癌多中心验证研究:简化和改进的TNM分期系统提案
J Cancer. 2020 Mar 13;11(12):3483-3491. doi: 10.7150/jca.36891. eCollection 2020.
2
Eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system: are we getting closer to the ideal classification for gastric cancer?美国癌症联合委员会第八版癌症分期系统:我们离胃癌的理想分类更近了吗?
Ann Transl Med. 2019 Mar;7(Suppl 1):S52. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.03.05.
3
Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems.

本文引用的文献

1
Harvest of at Least 23 Lymph Nodes is Indispensable for Stage N3 Gastric Cancer Patients.对于N3期胃癌患者,至少切除23个淋巴结是必不可少的。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;24(4):998-1002. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5667-4. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
2
Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4).《日本胃癌治疗指南2014(第4版)》
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Jan;20(1):1-19. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
3
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.
国际癌症控制联盟第八版胃癌淋巴结分期系统与其他两种淋巴结分期系统的比较。
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan;17(1):1299-1305. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9694. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
Proposal and validation of a modified staging system to improve the prognosis predictive performance of the 8th AJCC/UICC pTNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study with external validation.提出并验证了一种改良的分期系统,以提高第 8 版 AJCC/UICC pTNM 分期系统对胃腺癌预后预测性能:一项多中心研究及外部验证。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2018 Nov 19;38(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40880-018-0337-5.
5
Proposal for a New TNM Stage based on the 7 and 8 American Joint Committee on Cancer pTNM Staging Classification for Gastric Cancer.基于美国癌症联合委员会第7版和第8版胃癌pTNM分期分类的新TNM分期提案。
J Cancer. 2018 Sep 8;9(19):3570-3576. doi: 10.7150/jca.26351. eCollection 2018.
6
Superiority of the 8th edition of the TNM staging system for predicting overall survival in gastric cancer: Comparative analysis of the 7th and 8th editions in a monoinstitutional cohort.第8版TNM分期系统在预测胃癌总生存期方面的优越性:单中心队列中第7版与第8版的比较分析
Mol Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;9(4):423-431. doi: 10.3892/mco.2018.1683. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
聚焦于“N”参数相关生存率的AJCC/UICC胃癌TNM分期系统第6版与第7版比较:意大利单中心NodUs研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0633-3.
4
Differences in gastric cancer survival between the U.S. and China.美国和中国胃癌患者生存率的差异。
J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;112(1):31-7. doi: 10.1002/jso.23940. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
5
Validating the prognostic and discriminating value of the TNM-classification for gastric cancer - a critical appraisal.验证胃癌TNM分期的预后及鉴别价值——一项批判性评估。
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Mar;51(5):577-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.055. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
The rationality of N3 classification in the 7th edition of the International Union Against Cancer TNM staging system for gastric adenocarcinomas: a case-control study.第 7 版国际抗癌联盟 TNM 分期系统中 N3 分类在胃腺癌中的合理性:一项病例对照研究。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(9):893-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Jul 12.
7
Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China.比较第六版和第七版肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统在评估胃癌患者总生存期中区域淋巴结分期的作用:中国单中心病例对照研究结果。
Surgery. 2014 Jul;156(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
8
Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer.第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统的验证。
Cancer. 2011 Jun 1;117(11):2371-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25778. Epub 2011 Jan 11.
9
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.无论检查的淋巴结数量多少,淋巴结比率都是可切除(R0)胃癌患者的独立预后因素。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318246b4e9.
10
Comparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database.基于淋巴结比率的分期系统与第 7 版 AJCC 系统在胃癌中的比较:来自 SEER 数据库的 18043 例患者的分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):478-85. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824857e2.