Tumwesige Vianney, Okello Gabriel, Semple Sean, Smith Jo
Institute of Biological & Environmental Science, University of Aberdeen, 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, AB24 3UU, UK; African Centre for Clean Air, Kampala, Uganda.
Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Westburn Road Aberdeen, AB25 2ZG, UK; African Centre for Clean Air, Kampala, Uganda.
Environ Pollut. 2017 Dec;231(Pt 1):1021-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.118. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Over 700 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa depend on solid biomass fuel and use simple cookstoves in poorly ventilated kitchens, which results in high indoor concentrations of household air pollutants. Switching from biomass to biogas as a cooking fuel can reduce airborne emissions of fine particulate matter (PM) and carbon monoxide (CO), but households often only partially convert to biogas, continuing to use solid biomass fuels for part of their daily cooking needs. There is little evidence of the benefits of partial switching to biogas. This study monitored real-time PM and CO concentrations in 35 households in Cameroon and Uganda where biogas and firewood (or charcoal) were used. The 24 h mean PM concentrations in households that used: (1) firewood and charcoal; (2) both firewood (mean 54% cooking time) and biogas (mean 46% cooking time); and (3) only biogas, were 449 μg m, 173 μg m and 18 μg m respectively. The corresponding 24 h mean CO concentrations were 14.2 ppm, 2.7 ppm and 0.5 ppm. Concentrations of both PM and CO were high and exceeded the World Health Organisation guidelines when firewood and charcoal were used. Partially switching to biogas reduced CO exposure to below the World Health Organisation guidelines, but PM concentrations were only below the 24 h recommended limits when households fully converted to biogas fuel. These results indicate that partial switching from solid fuels to biogas is not sufficient and continues to produce concentrations of household air pollution that are likely to harm the health of those exposed. Programmes introducing biogas should aim to ensure that household energy needs can be fully achieved using biogas with no requirement to continue using solid fuels.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区超过7亿人依赖固体生物质燃料,并在通风不良的厨房中使用简易炉灶,这导致室内家庭空气污染物浓度很高。将烹饪燃料从生物质转换为沼气可以减少空气中细颗粒物(PM)和一氧化碳(CO)的排放,但家庭通常只是部分转换为沼气,仍会继续使用固体生物质燃料来满足部分日常烹饪需求。几乎没有证据表明部分转换为沼气有什么好处。本研究监测了喀麦隆和乌干达35个同时使用沼气和木柴(或木炭)的家庭中的实时PM和CO浓度。使用以下燃料的家庭中24小时平均PM浓度分别为:(1)木柴和木炭,449μg/m;(2)木柴(平均烹饪时间54%)和沼气(平均烹饪时间46%),173μg/m;(3)仅使用沼气,18μg/m。相应的24小时平均CO浓度分别为14.2ppm、2.7ppm和0.5ppm。使用木柴和木炭时,PM和CO的浓度都很高,超过了世界卫生组织的准则。部分转换为沼气可将CO暴露降低到世界卫生组织准则以下,但只有当家庭完全转换为沼气燃料时,PM浓度才会低于24小时推荐限值。这些结果表明,从固体燃料部分转换为沼气是不够的,仍会产生可能危害接触者健康的家庭空气污染浓度。引入沼气的计划应旨在确保家庭能源需求能够完全通过使用沼气来满足,而无需继续使用固体燃料。