Chen Xin-Lin, Zhong Liang-Huan, Wen Yi, Liu Tian-Wen, Li Xiao-Ying, Hou Zheng-Kun, Hu Yue, Mo Chuan-Wei, Liu Feng-Bin
College of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 15;15(1):177. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0753-2.
This review aims to critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-specific health-related quality of life instruments.
Medline, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched from their inception to May 2016. IBD-specific instruments for patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBD were enrolled. The basic characteristics and domains of the instruments were collected. The methodological quality of measurement properties and measurement properties of the instruments were assessed.
Fifteen IBD-specific instruments were included, which included twelve instruments for adult IBD patients and three for paediatric IBD patients. All of the instruments were developed in North American and European countries. The following common domains were identified: IBD-related symptoms, physical, emotional and social domain. The methodological quality was satisfactory for content validity; fair in internal consistency, reliability, structural validity, hypotheses testing and criterion validity; and poor in measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness. For adult IBD patients, the IBDQ-32 and its short version (SIBDQ) had good measurement properties and were the most widely used worldwide. For paediatric IBD patients, the IMPACT-III had good measurement properties and had more translated versions.
Most methodological quality should be promoted, especially measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness. The IBDQ-32 was the most widely used instrument with good reliability and validity, followed by the SIBDQ and IMPACT-III. Further validation studies are necessary to support the use of other instruments.
本综述旨在严格评估和比较炎症性肠病(IBD)特异性健康相关生活质量工具的测量特性。
检索了Medline、EMBASE和ISI Web of Knowledge自创建至2016年5月的文献。纳入了针对克罗恩病、溃疡性结肠炎或IBD患者的IBD特异性工具。收集了这些工具的基本特征和领域。评估了测量特性的方法学质量以及工具的测量特性。
纳入了15种IBD特异性工具,其中包括12种针对成年IBD患者的工具和3种针对儿童IBD患者的工具。所有工具均在北美和欧洲国家开发。确定了以下常见领域:IBD相关症状、身体、情感和社会领域。内容效度的方法学质量令人满意;内部一致性、信度、结构效度、假设检验和效标效度一般;测量误差、跨文化效度和反应度较差。对于成年IBD患者,IBDQ-32及其简版(SIBDQ)具有良好的测量特性,在全球使用最为广泛。对于儿童IBD患者,IMPACT-III具有良好的测量特性,且有更多的翻译版本。
应提高大多数方法学质量,尤其是测量误差、跨文化效度和反应度。IBDQ-32是使用最广泛的工具,具有良好的信度和效度,其次是SIBDQ和IMPACT-III。需要进一步的验证研究来支持其他工具的使用。