Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, 5100 Wisconsin Ave NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20016, United States.
Dow AgroSciences Ltd, 3B Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 4RN, United Kingdom.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;90:197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
Although an internationally-adopted in vitro dermal absorption test guideline is available (OECD Test Guideline 428), the replacement of the in vivo approach in North America for pesticide formulations has not occurred due to concern over the reliability and consistency of the in vitro results. A 2012 workshop convened a panel of experts in the conduct of in vitro studies used for pesticide risk assessment, together with North American regulators, to examine techniques for in vitro dermal absorption testing. Discussions led to the recommended "best practices" for the conduct of in vitro dermal absorption studies provided herein. The workshop participants also developed recommendations for reporting study results in order to improve the quality and consistency of the data submitted to regulatory agencies in North America. Finally, a case study is presented that illustrates the use of the "triple-pack" approach; the studies, conducted for the registration of sulfoxaflor, follow the standardized recommendations provided at the workshop. In addressing the concerns of these regulators and of the regulated community, and providing harmonized recommendations to facilitate comparative data analyses, it is anticipated that wider acceptance of in vitro dermal absorption studies alone can be achieved for pesticide risk assessment.
尽管已经有一项国际通行的体外皮肤吸收测试指南(OECD 测试指南 428),但由于对体外结果的可靠性和一致性的担忧,北美地区仍未将其替代体内方法用于农药制剂。2012 年的一次研讨会召集了一批在进行用于农药风险评估的体外研究方面的专家,以及北美监管机构,共同探讨了体外皮肤吸收测试技术。讨论产生了本文所提供的进行体外皮肤吸收研究的“最佳实践”建议。研讨会参与者还就报告研究结果提出了建议,以提高提交给北美的监管机构的数据的质量和一致性。最后,提出了一个案例研究,说明了“三联包”方法的使用;这些研究是为了磺酰氟的注册而进行的,遵循了研讨会提供的标准化建议。通过解决这些监管机构和受监管方的关注,并提供协调一致的建议以促进比较数据分析,可以预期,在农药风险评估方面,单独使用体外皮肤吸收研究将得到更广泛的接受。