Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research".
作者信息
Meerpohl Joerg J, Naude Celeste E, Garner Paul, Mustafa Reem A, Schünemann Holger J
机构信息
Cochrane Germany, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Center for Evidence-based Health Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
出版信息
Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):789-790. doi: 10.3945/an.117.016188. Print 2017 Sep.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comment on "Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research".
Adv Nutr. 2017 Sep 15;8(5):789-790. doi: 10.3945/an.117.016188. Print 2017 Sep.
2
Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.
Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):994-1004. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013052. Print 2016 Nov.
3
Erratum for Schwingshackl et al. Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research. Adv Nutr 2016;7:994-1004.
Adv Nutr. 2017 Mar 15;8(2):399. doi: 10.3945/an.117.015206. Print 2017 Mar.
4
Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1887-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422507.
5
Effects of diet on obesity-related anthropometric characteristics in adults: a protocol for an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 13;12(1):e050579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050579.
6
Observational studies and randomized trials.
N Engl J Med. 2000 Oct 19;343(16):1194-5; author reply 1196-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200010193431613.
7
The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design: a valid and efficient alternative to pragmatic trials?
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):96-102. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw050.
8
Randomized trials or observational tribulations?
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1907-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200006223422511.
9
Network meta-analysis incorporating randomized controlled trials and non-randomized comparative cohort studies for assessing the safety and effectiveness of medical treatments: challenges and opportunities.
Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 5;4:147. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0133-0.
10
Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.1301.
引用本文的文献
1
Nutrition Users' Guides: an introduction to structured guides to evaluate the nutrition literature.
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2025 Apr 7;8(1):e000832. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2023-000832. eCollection 2025.
2
Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition: Categorical Thinking and the Stigma of Commercial Collaboration.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2024 Jul 17;8(8):104413. doi: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104413. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Efficacy and safety of low and very low carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes remission: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished randomized trial data.
BMJ. 2021 Jan 13;372:m4743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4743.
4
Improving the trustworthiness of findings from nutrition evidence syntheses: assessing risk of bias and rating the certainty of evidence.
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Sep;60(6):2893-2903. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02464-1. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
5
The Philosophy of Evidence-Based Principles and Practice in Nutrition.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 May 27;3(2):189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.02.005. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Perspective: The Evidence-Based Framework in Nutrition and Dietetics: Implementation, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy113.
7
The risk of bias in observational studies of exposures (ROBINS-E) tool: concerns arising from application to observational studies of exposures.
Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 21;7(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0915-2.
本文引用的文献
1
Scope and quality of Cochrane reviews of nutrition interventions: a cross-sectional study.
Nutr J. 2017 Apr 7;16(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12937-017-0244-7.
2
Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.
Adv Nutr. 2016 Nov 15;7(6):994-1004. doi: 10.3945/an.116.013052. Print 2016 Nov.
3
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
4
Food supplementation for improving the physical and psychosocial health of socio-economically disadvantaged children aged three months to five years.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 5;2015(3):CD009924. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009924.pub2.
5
Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies.
BMJ. 2012 Jan 15;346:e7492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7492.
6
Effects of higher- versus lower-protein diets on health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012 Jul;66(7):780-8. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.37. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
7
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
8
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
9
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
10
On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions.
Biostatistics. 2001 Dec;2(4):463-71. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/2.4.463.
Zotero 插件