Marzouki Hani Z, Altabsh Mohammed A, Albakrei Mohammed O, Al-Khatib Talal A, Merdad Mazin A, Farsi Nada J
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Jeddah, King Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail.
Saudi Med J. 2017 Oct;38(10):1000-1006. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.10.20988.
To determine the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) for detecting malignant parotid tumors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with benign or malignant parotid gland tumors in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2004 and May 2015. The records of 65 subjects were obtained. Histopathological findings and data from FNA examinations were obtained from medical records. Twenty-three subjects were excluded due to missing FNA, histopathology results or both. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of FNA for detecting malignant lesions were estimated and compared with the gold standard, histopathology. Results: The specimens of 5 cases were insufficient for diagnosis; therefore, 38 cases were diagnosed by FNA and had histopathological reports. Three cases were diagnosed positive for cancer using histopathology and missed by FNA, 3 were diagnosed as malignant lesions using both FNA and histopathology, and 32 cases were determined benign based on histopathology and FNA analysis. The total prevalence of parotid malignancies was 15.8%. The sensitivity of FNA for detecting malignancy was 50%, and the specificity was 100%; with a positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 91.4%. Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration is a highly specific, but only moderately sensitive test. We support the use of this method as an initial tool for diagnosing parotid gland malignancies, as it is a safe, rapid, and painless procedure, compared to histopathology.
确定细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)检测腮腺恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性。方法:我们对2004年1月至2015年5月期间在沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院被诊断为良性或恶性腮腺肿瘤的所有患者进行了一项回顾性研究。获取了65名受试者的记录。组织病理学结果和FNA检查数据来自病历。由于缺少FNA、组织病理学结果或两者均缺失,23名受试者被排除。估计FNA检测恶性病变的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值和阳性预测值,并与金标准组织病理学进行比较。结果:5例标本诊断不足;因此,38例通过FNA诊断并具有组织病理学报告。3例经组织病理学诊断为癌症阳性但FNA漏诊,3例FNA和组织病理学均诊断为恶性病变,32例根据组织病理学和FNA分析确定为良性。腮腺恶性肿瘤的总患病率为15.8%。FNA检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性为50%,特异性为100%;阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为91.4%。结论:细针穿刺抽吸是一种高度特异但敏感性仅为中等的检测方法。我们支持将该方法作为诊断腮腺恶性肿瘤的初始工具,因为与组织病理学相比,它是一种安全、快速且无痛的检查方法。