Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Brazil.
Masters and Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo, Brazil; Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia.
Physiotherapy. 2018 Mar;104(1):149-151. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.12.001. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
BACKGROUND: Kinesio taping is a commonly used intervention for patients with chronic low back pain. However, the medium term effects of kinesio taping in these patients are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of kinesio taping in patients with chronic low back pain after 6 months from randomization. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled trial with a 6 months follow up. One hundred and forty eight participants were randomly assigned to the experimental (kinesio taping with skin convolutions) or control (kinesio taping without convolutions-Sham Taping) group. Participants from both groups had the tape reapplied twice a week for four weeks. The outcomes were pain, disability and global impression of recovery after 6 months. RESULTS: One participant was lost to follow up in the experimental group (n=73, response rate 99%) and two in the control group (n=72, response rate 97%). After 6 months there were no statistically significant between-group differences in pain intensity (between-group difference -0.8 points, 95% CI -1.7 to 0.2), global impression of recovery (0.4, -0.7 to 1.5), or disability (-1.1, -3.0 to 0.7). CONCLUSION: Four weeks of kinesio taping treatment was no better than sham taping for patients with chronic low back pain, at 6 months follow-up. Trial Registration Number (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/): RBR-7ggfkv (Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials).
背景:肌内效贴布是一种常用于慢性下背痛患者的干预措施。然而,其在这些患者中的中期效果尚不清楚。 目的:在随机分组后 6 个月时,调查肌内效贴布对慢性下背痛患者的疗效。 方法:这是一项为期 6 个月随访的随机对照试验。148 名参与者被随机分配到实验组(带皮肤卷曲的肌内效贴布)或对照组(无卷曲的肌内效贴布-假贴布)。两组参与者均每周接受两次贴布治疗,持续四周。在 6 个月时评估疼痛、残疾和整体康复印象等结局。 结果:实验组有 1 名参与者失访(n=73,应答率 99%),对照组有 2 名参与者失访(n=72,应答率 97%)。6 个月后,两组之间疼痛强度(组间差异 -0.8 分,95%CI -1.7 至 0.2)、整体康复印象(0.4,-0.7 至 1.5)或残疾(-1.1,-3.0 至 0.7)均无统计学显著差异。 结论:在慢性下背痛患者中,4 周的肌内效贴布治疗并不优于假贴布治疗,随访 6 个月时结果如此。试验注册号(http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/):RBR-7ggfkv(巴西临床试验注册)。
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023-11-7
J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2020-12-1
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020-11-20
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020-9-15
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2019-8