Suppr超能文献

医疗相关检查及诊断检查策略的决策。论文5:一项针对专家的定性研究表明,仅凭检查准确性数据很少足以做出决策。

Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 5: a qualitative study with experts suggests that test accuracy data alone is rarely sufficient for decision making.

作者信息

Mustafa Reem A, Wiercioch Wojtek, Ventresca Matthew, Brozek Jan, Schünemann Holger J

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (formerly "Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics"), McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, MS3002, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (formerly "Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics"), McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the study was to identify the critical factors that determine recommendations and other decisions about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic strategies (HCTDS).

METHODS

We used a qualitative descriptive approach and conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 24 international experts (informants) in evidence and decisions about HCTDS.

RESULTS

Although test accuracy (TA) was the factor most commonly considered by organizations when developing recommendations about HCTDS, informants agreed that TA is necessary but rarely, if ever, sufficient and may be misleading when solely considered. The informants identified factors that are important for developing recommendations about HCTDS. Informants largely agreed that laying out the potential care pathways based on the test result is an essential early step but is rarely done in developing recommendations about HCTDS. Most informants also agreed that decision analysis could be useful for organizing the clinical, cost, and preference data relevant to the use of tests in the absence of direct evidence. However, they noted that using models is limited by the lack of resources and expertise required.

CONCLUSION

Developing guidelines about HCTDS requires consideration of factors beyond TA, but implementing this may be challenging. Further development and testing of "frameworks" that can guide this process is a priority for decision makers.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定决定医疗保健相关检测和诊断策略(HCTDS)的推荐及其他决策的关键因素。

方法

我们采用定性描述方法,对24位国际专家(受访者)进行了关于HCTDS证据和决策的半结构化深度访谈。

结果

尽管检测准确性(TA)是各组织在制定关于HCTDS的推荐时最常考虑的因素,但受访者一致认为TA是必要的,但单独考虑时很少足够,甚至可能产生误导。受访者确定了对制定关于HCTDS的推荐很重要的因素。受访者大多同意,根据检测结果规划潜在的护理途径是至关重要的早期步骤,但在制定关于HCTDS的推荐时很少这样做。大多数受访者还同意,在缺乏直接证据的情况下,决策分析有助于整理与检测使用相关的临床、成本和偏好数据。然而,他们指出,使用模型受到所需资源和专业知识不足的限制。

结论

制定关于HCTDS的指南需要考虑TA以外的因素,但实施起来可能具有挑战性。决策者的首要任务是进一步开发和测试能够指导这一过程的“框架”。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验