• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗相关检查及诊断检查策略的决策。论文2:方法学及实际挑战综述

Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challenges.

作者信息

Mustafa Reem A, Wiercioch Wojtek, Cheung Adrienne, Prediger Barbara, Brozek Jan, Bossuyt Patrick, Garg Amit X, Lelgemann Monika, Büehler Diedrich, Schünemann Holger J

机构信息

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (formerly "Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics"), McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; Departments of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, MS3002, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA.

Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (formerly "Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics"), McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.003
PMID:28916488
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In this first of a series of five articles, we provide an overview of how and why healthcare-related tests and diagnostic strategies are currently applied. We also describe how our findings can be integrated with existing frameworks for making decisions that guide the use of healthcare-related tests and diagnostic strategies.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We searched MEDLINE, references of identified articles, chapters in relevant textbooks, and identified articles citing classic literature on this topic.

RESULTS

We provide updated frameworks for the potential roles and applications of tests with suggested definitions and practical examples. We also discuss study designs that are commonly used to assess tests' performance and the effects of tests on people's health. These designs include diagnostic randomized controlled trials and retrospective validation. We describe the utility of these and other currently suggested designs, which questions they can answer and which ones they cannot. In addition, we summarize the challenges unique to decision-making resulting from the use of tests.

CONCLUSION

This overview highlights current challenges in the application of tests in decision-making in healthcare, provides clarifications, and informs the proposed solutions.

摘要

目标

在这一系列五篇文章的第一篇中,我们概述了当前医疗相关检查和诊断策略的应用方式及原因。我们还描述了如何将我们的研究结果与现有的决策框架相结合,这些框架指导医疗相关检查和诊断策略的使用。

研究设计与背景

我们检索了MEDLINE、已识别文章的参考文献、相关教科书的章节,并识别了引用该主题经典文献的文章。

结果

我们提供了关于检查潜在作用和应用的更新框架,并给出了建议定义和实际示例。我们还讨论了常用于评估检查性能以及检查对人们健康影响的研究设计。这些设计包括诊断随机对照试验和回顾性验证。我们描述了这些以及其他当前建议设计的效用,它们能回答哪些问题以及不能回答哪些问题。此外,我们总结了因使用检查而导致的决策中特有的挑战。

结论

本概述突出了当前在医疗决策中应用检查所面临的挑战,提供了相关阐释,并为提出的解决方案提供了信息。

相似文献

1
Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 2: a review of methodological and practical challenges.医疗相关检查及诊断检查策略的决策。论文2:方法学及实际挑战综述
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
2
Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 4: International guidelines show variability in their approaches.医疗相关检查及诊断检查策略的决策。论文4:国际指南在其方法上存在差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.004. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 3: a systematic review shows limitations in most tools designed to assess quality and develop recommendations.关于医疗相关检查和诊断检查策略的决策。第3篇论文:一项系统评价显示,大多数旨在评估质量并制定建议的工具存在局限性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.007. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
4
Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies. Paper 5: a qualitative study with experts suggests that test accuracy data alone is rarely sufficient for decision making.医疗相关检查及诊断检查策略的决策。论文5:一项针对专家的定性研究表明,仅凭检查准确性数据很少足以做出决策。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:47-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
5
Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.慢性下腰痛手术治疗中的决策:用于选择腰椎融合术患者的预后测试的效能
Acta Orthop Suppl. 2013 Feb;84(349):1-35. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.753565.
6
Decision making about healthcare-related tests and diagnostic test strategies: what "The death of Ivan Ilyich" teaches us.关于医疗相关检查和诊断测试策略的决策:《伊凡·伊里奇之死》给我们的启示
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:97-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第5部分。诊断准确性研究。
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40.
8
Rational use of diagnostic tests for clinical decision making.合理使用诊断测试以进行临床决策。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Mar;65(3):452-459. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.3.452. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
9
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
10
A guide to aid the selection of diagnostic tests.辅助诊断检测选择的指南。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Sep 1;95(9):639-645. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.187468. Epub 2017 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
How to develop rapid reviews of diagnostic tests according to experts: A qualitative exploration of researcher views.专家如何开展诊断试验的快速综述:对研究者观点的定性探索
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Apr 13;1(2):e12006. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12006. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
GRADE guidance 40: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework for environmental and occupational health.GRADE指南40:环境与职业健康的GRADE证据到决策框架
Environ Int. 2025 Mar;197:109314. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109314. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
3
Development of a framework to structure decision-making in environmental and occupational health: A systematic review and Delphi study.
构建环境与职业健康决策框架的研究:一项系统综述与德尔菲研究
Environ Int. 2025 Jan;195:109209. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109209. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
4
Co-creation of a step-by-step guide for specifying the test-management pathway to formulate focused guideline questions about healthcare related tests.共同创建一份逐步指南,用于指定测试管理途径,以制定有关医疗相关测试的重点指南问题。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 16;24(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02365-5.
5
The predictive potential of different molecular markers linked to amikacin susceptibility phenotypes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.不同分子标记物与铜绿假单胞菌阿米卡星药敏表型的预测潜力。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 25;17(4):e0267396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267396. eCollection 2022.
6
Development and evaluation of safety and effectiveness of novel cancer screening tests for routine clinical use with applications to multicancer detection technologies.新型癌症筛查检测的安全性和有效性的开发和评估,用于常规临床应用,适用于多种癌症检测技术。
Cancer. 2022 Feb 15;128 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):883-891. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33954.
7
Current methods for development of rapid reviews about diagnostic tests: an international survey.当前诊断测试快速综述开发方法:国际调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 13;20(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01004-z.
8
2019 sickle cell disease guidelines by the American Society of Hematology: methodology, challenges, and innovations.2019 年美国血液学会镰状细胞病指南:方法学、挑战和创新。
Blood Adv. 2019 Dec 10;3(23):3945-3950. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000931.
9
American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for sickle cell disease: cardiopulmonary and kidney disease.美国血液学会 2019 年镰状细胞病指南:心肺和肾脏疾病。
Blood Adv. 2019 Dec 10;3(23):3867-3897. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000916.
10
An algorithm for the classification of study designs to assess diagnostic, prognostic and predictive test accuracy in systematic reviews.用于在系统评价中评估诊断、预后和预测性试验准确性的研究设计分类算法。
Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;8(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1131-4.