Guo Peipei, Gao Fuqiang, Zhao Tingting, Sun Wei, Wang Bailiang, Li Zirong
The Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Beijing.
Centre for Osteonecrosis and Joint-Preserving & Reconstruction, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Key Laboratory of Arthritic and Rheumatic Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, China.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Nov;26(11):2470-2476. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.08.019. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a common and serious complication following a stroke, and many clinical research have been conducted to evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on muscle spasticity in poststroke patients. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect on decreasing spasticity caused by a stroke immediately and 4 weeks after the application of shock wave therapy. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant studies through November 2016 using the following item: (Hypertonia OR Spasticity) and (Shock Wave or ESWT) and (Stroke). The outcomes were evaluated by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) grades and pooled by Stata 12.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA). RESULTS: Six studies consisting of 9 groups were included in this meta-analysis. The MAS grades immediately after ESWT were significantly improved compared with the baseline values (standardized mean difference [SMD], -1.57; 95% confidence intervals [CIs], -2.20, -.94). Similarly, the MAS grades judged at 4 weeks after ESWT were also showed to be significantly lower than the baseline values (SMD, -1.93; 95% CIs, -2.71, -1.15). CONCLUSIONS: ESWT for the spasticity of patients after a stroke is effective, as measured by MAS grades. Moreover, no serious side effects were observed in any patients after shock wave therapy. Nevertheless, our current study with some limitations such as the limited sample size only provided limited quality of evidence; confirmation from a further systematic review or meta-analysis with large-scale, well-designed randomized control trials is required.
背景:痉挛是中风后常见且严重的并发症,已经开展了许多临床研究来评估体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)对中风后患者肌肉痉挛的影响。本荟萃分析旨在评估冲击波疗法应用后即刻及4周时对降低中风所致痉挛的治疗效果。 方法:我们通过以下检索词在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索截至2016年11月的相关研究:(张力亢进或痉挛)以及(冲击波或ESWT)以及(中风)。采用改良Ashworth量表(MAS)分级评估结果,并使用Stata 12.0(美国德克萨斯州大学站市Stata公司)进行汇总。 结果:本荟萃分析纳入了6项研究共9组。与基线值相比,ESWT后即刻的MAS分级有显著改善(标准化均数差[SMD],-1.57;95%置信区间[CI],-2.20,-0.94)。同样,ESWT后4周时判断的MAS分级也显著低于基线值(SMD,-1.93;95%CI,-2.71,-1.15)。 结论:以MAS分级衡量,ESWT对中风后患者的痉挛有效。此外,冲击波治疗后未在任何患者中观察到严重副作用。然而,我们目前的研究存在一些局限性,如样本量有限,仅提供了有限的证据质量;需要进一步通过大规模、设计良好的随机对照试验进行系统评价或荟萃分析来加以证实。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Health Technol Assess. 2024-10
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-16