Suppr超能文献

非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者当日返回转诊非PCI中心的RETRIEVE(反向分诊事件)标准的验证

Validation of the RETRIEVE (REverse TRIage EVEnts) Criteria for Same Day Return of Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients to Referring Non-PCI Centres.

作者信息

Burgess Sonya N, Nguyen Vu Huynh, Xu James, Hinde Yoshio, Dharmadmajan Anoop, Brennan Xavier, Owen Karen, Lintern Karen, Juergens Craig, Lo Sidney, Nguyen Phong, Kadappu Krishna K, French John K, Rajaratnam Rohan

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Cardiology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Jul;27(7):792-797. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are continuing bed constraints in percutaneous coronary intervention centres (PCI) so efficient patient triage from referral hospitals is pivotal. To evaluate a strategy of PCI centre (PCIC) bed-sparing we examined return of patients to referral hospitals screened by the RETRIEVE (REverse TRIage EVEnts) criteria and validated its use as a tool for screening suitability for same day transfer of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) patients post PCI to their referring non-PCI centre (NPCIC).

METHODS

From May 2008 to May 2011, 433 NSTEACS patients were prospectively screened for suitability for same day transfer back to the referring hospital at the completion of PCI. Of these patients, 212 were excluded from same day transfer using the RETRIEVE criteria and 221 patients met the RETRIEVE criteria and were transferred back to their NPCIC.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 218 patients (98.6%) had no major adverse events. The primary endpoint (death, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction, major bleeding event, cerebrovascular accident, major vascular site complication, or requirement for return to the PCIC) was seen in only three transferred patients (1.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The RETRIEVE criteria can be used successfully to identify NSTEACS patients suitable for transfer back to NPCIC following PCI. Same day transfer to a NPCIC using the RETRIEVE criteria was associated with very low rates of major complications or repeat transfer and appears to be as safe as routine overnight observation in a PCIC.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中心(PCI)床位持续紧张,因此从转诊医院进行高效的患者分流至关重要。为评估PCI中心(PCIC)节省床位的策略,我们研究了根据RETRIEVE(反向分流事件)标准筛选后返回转诊医院的患者情况,并验证了其作为筛选非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTEACS)患者PCI术后当日转回其转诊非PCI中心(NPCIC)适用性工具的作用。

方法

2008年5月至2011年5月,前瞻性筛选了433例NSTEACS患者,评估其PCI完成后当日转回转诊医院的适用性。其中,212例患者根据RETRIEVE标准被排除当日转回,221例患者符合RETRIEVE标准并转回其NPCIC。

结果

在研究期间,218例患者(98.6%)未发生重大不良事件。仅3例转回患者(1.4%)出现主要终点事件(死亡、心律失常、心肌梗死、大出血事件、脑血管意外、主要血管部位并发症或返回PCIC的需求)。

结论

RETRIEVE标准可成功用于识别PCI术后适合转回NPCIC的NSTEACS患者。使用RETRIEVE标准当日转回NPCIC与极低的主要并发症或再次转回率相关,并且似乎与在PCIC进行常规过夜观察一样安全。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验