Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md; Department of Populations, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Md.
Acad Pediatr. 2018 Jul;18(5):510-515. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
Group care has been shown to be effective for delivery of infant well child care. Centering Parenting (CP) is a model of group dyad care for mothers and infants. CP might improve quality and efficiency of preventive care, particularly for low-income families. Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) might be optimal sites for implementation, however, facilitators and barriers might be unique. The aim of this qualitative study was to assess stakeholder perspectives on the feasibility of implementing CP in FQHCs in Baltimore.
Semistructured interviews were conducted with mothers, clinicians, staff, and administrators recruited from 2 FQHCs using purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and uploaded to Atlas.ti version 7.0 (Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development, GmbH Berlin, Germany) for analysis. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, 2 investigators coded the transcripts. Matrices of key codes were developed to identify themes and patterns across stakeholder groups.
Interviews were completed with 26 mothers and 16 clinicians, staff, and administrators. Most participants considered CP desirable. Facilitators included: peer support and education, emphasis on maternal wellness, and increased patient and clinician satisfaction. Barriers included: exposure to "others," scheduling and coordination of care, productivity, training requirements, and cost. Parenting experience did not appear to affect perspectives on CP.
Perceptions regarding facilitators and barriers to CP implementation in FQHCs are similar to existing group well-child care literature. The benefit of emphasis on maternal wellness is a unique finding. Maternal wellness integration might make CP a particularly desirable model for implementation at FQHCs, but potential systems barriers must be addressed.
小组护理已被证明对提供婴儿常规保健有效。以家庭为中心的育儿(CP)是一种母婴小组护理模式。CP 可能会提高预防保健的质量和效率,尤其是对于低收入家庭而言。合格的联邦健康中心(FQHCs)可能是实施 CP 的最佳场所,但是,促进因素和障碍可能是独特的。本定性研究的目的是评估利益相关者对在巴尔的摩的 FQHCs 中实施 CP 的可行性的看法。
通过目的抽样,从 2 家 FQHC 招募了母亲、临床医生、工作人员和管理人员进行半结构式访谈。访谈被记录下来,逐字转录,并上传到 Atlas.ti 版本 7.0(Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development, GmbH Berlin,德国)进行分析。使用归纳主题分析方法,2 名研究人员对转录本进行了编码。开发了关键代码的矩阵,以识别利益相关者群体之间的主题和模式。
完成了 26 位母亲和 16 位临床医生、工作人员和管理人员的访谈。大多数参与者认为 CP 是可取的。促进因素包括:同伴支持和教育、强调母亲的健康以及提高患者和临床医生的满意度。障碍包括:接触“他人”、护理的安排和协调、生产力、培训要求和成本。育儿经验似乎并未影响对 CP 的看法。
在 FQHCs 中实施 CP 的促进因素和障碍的看法与现有的小组常规儿童保健文献相似。强调母亲健康的益处是一个独特的发现。母亲健康整合可能使 CP 成为 FQHC 实施的一个特别理想的模式,但必须解决潜在的系统障碍。