• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析个案管理模式对专业姑息治疗多专业团队的影响。

Analysing the impact of a case management model on the specialised palliative care multi-professional team.

机构信息

Department of Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):673-679. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3893-3. Epub 2017 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-017-3893-3
PMID:28920137
Abstract

PURPOSE

Palliative care (PC) involves many health care providers leading to a high complexity of structures that requires efficient coordination as provided by case management (CM). Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of CM newly implemented in a specialised palliative care unit by evaluating team members' tasks and time resources before (T0) and after implementation (T1). It was hypothesised that team members would be able to spend less time on organisational and administrative tasks and more time on patient care.

METHODS

A prospective pre-post study design was used. Time distribution of different tasks at T0 and T1 was compared between three different professional groups: physicians, nursing staff and social work. To document their tasks and time required, a documentation form with several items for each profession was developed. Data was analysed using t tests for independent samples.

RESULTS

After Bonferroni correction, a significant pre-post difference was found for the time spent on "discharge interview and discharge" as rated by the physicians (p < .001) with less time spent on this activity after CM implementation. The nursing staff had significantly more time for "conversations with patients" (p < .001) after CM implementation. Moreover, they spent significantly less time on "patient-related requests/advice by telephone" (p < .001) and "discussions with relatives/participation in family discussions" at post-assessment (p < .001). The social worker had significantly more time for "patient advice and support services" (p = .013) after CM implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating CM can be time efficient and ensures team members to spend more time on their core tasks in patient care.

摘要

目的

姑息治疗(PC)涉及许多医疗保健提供者,导致结构高度复杂,需要由个案管理(CM)提供有效的协调。我们的研究旨在评估新实施的专门姑息治疗病房中的 CM 对团队成员的任务和时间资源的影响,在实施前后(T0 和 T1)进行评估。假设团队成员能够将更多的时间用于患者护理,减少组织和行政任务的时间。

方法

采用前瞻性前后研究设计。在 T0 和 T1 时,使用独立样本 t 检验比较了三种不同专业群体(医生、护理人员和社会工作者)的不同任务的时间分配。为了记录他们的任务和所需时间,为每个专业开发了一个带有多个项目的文档表单。

结果

在 Bonferroni 校正后,医生评定的“出院访谈和出院”时间有显著的前后差异(p < 0.001),实施 CM 后,他们在这项活动上花费的时间减少了。护理人员进行“与患者的谈话”的时间明显增加(p < 0.001)。此外,他们在“通过电话与患者相关的请求/建议”(p < 0.001)和“与亲属讨论/参加家庭讨论”(p < 0.001)的时间明显减少。实施 CM 后,社会工作者有更多的时间用于“患者建议和支持服务”(p = 0.013)。

结论

整合 CM 可以提高效率,确保团队成员将更多的时间用于患者护理的核心任务。

相似文献

1
Analysing the impact of a case management model on the specialised palliative care multi-professional team.分析个案管理模式对专业姑息治疗多专业团队的影响。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Feb;26(2):673-679. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3893-3. Epub 2017 Sep 17.
2
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
3
Experiences of Family Members of Dying Patients Receiving Palliative Sedation.接受姑息性镇静治疗的临终患者家庭成员的经历。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2016 Nov 1;43(6):E226-E232. doi: 10.1188/16.ONF.E226-E232.
4
The Heidelberg Milestones Communication Approach (MCA) for patients with prognosis <12 months: protocol for a mixed-methods study including a randomized controlled trial.针对预后小于12个月患者的海德堡里程碑式沟通方法(MCA):一项包括随机对照试验的混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Aug 14;19(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2814-1.
5
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
6
Preliminary report of the integration of a palliative care team into an intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗团队整合的初步报告。
Palliat Med. 2010 Mar;24(2):154-65. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346540. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
7
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.农村姑息支持服务的可行性
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.
8
Palliative care consultation team on acute wards-an intervention study with pre-post comparisons.急性病房姑息治疗咨询团队——一项前后对比的干预性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Feb;25(2):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3406-9. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
9
New concepts in palliative care in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房姑息治疗的新概念。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Apr-Jun;29(2):222-230. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170031.
10
[Mobile team of palliative care in a department of neurology: value of two multidisciplinary and professional groups fruit of a joint distribution of the palliative approach and ethical support].[神经内科姑息治疗移动团队:两个多学科专业小组的价值——姑息治疗方法与伦理支持联合分配的成果]
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2013 Apr;169(4):335-44. doi: 10.1016/j.neurol.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
"So at least now I know how to deal with things myself, what I can do if it gets really bad again"-experiences with a long-term cross-sectoral advocacy care and case management for severe multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study.“所以现在至少我知道自己该如何应对了,如果情况再次变得非常糟糕,我可以做些什么”——为严重多发性硬化症提供长期跨部门倡导护理和病例管理的经验:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10851-1.
2
Communication, Coordination, and Security for People with Multiple Sclerosis (COCOS-MS): a randomised phase II clinical trial protocol.多发性硬化症患者的沟通、协调和安全(COCOS-MS):一项随机的 II 期临床试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 25;12(1):e049300. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049300.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Access to palliative care services during a terminal hospital episode reduces intervention rates and hospital costs: a database study of 19 707 elderly patients dying in hospital, 2011-2015.在医院终末期接受姑息治疗服务可降低干预率和医院成本:一项针对2011 - 2015年在医院死亡的19707名老年患者的数据库研究。
Intern Med J. 2017 May;47(5):549-556. doi: 10.1111/imj.13400.
2
[Data on palliative care in Germany : Which data sources are available and what do they tell?].[德国姑息治疗数据:有哪些可用数据源以及它们能说明什么?]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Jan;60(1):26-36. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2483-8.
3
Can case management improve cancer patients quality of life?: A systematic review following PRISMA.
病例管理能否改善癌症患者的生活质量?:一项遵循PRISMA的系统评价
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2;99(40):e22448. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022448.
[Healthcare structures in palliative care medicine : Flowchart for patients with incurable cancer].
[姑息治疗医学中的医疗结构:不可治愈癌症患者流程图]
Internist (Berl). 2016 Oct;57(10):953-958. doi: 10.1007/s00108-016-0127-6.
4
Effectiveness of case management as a cross-sectoral healthcare provision for women with breast cancer.病例管理作为乳腺癌女性跨部门医疗保健服务的有效性。
Psychooncology. 2017 Mar;26(3):354-360. doi: 10.1002/pon.4139. Epub 2016 May 6.
5
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
6
Breaking bad news about transitions to dying: a qualitative exploration of the role of the District Nurse.告知临终转变的坏消息:对社区护士角色的质性探索
Palliat Med. 2015 Feb;29(2):138-46. doi: 10.1177/0269216314551813. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
7
Examining End-of-Life Case Management: Systematic Review.审视临终病例管理:系统综述
Nurs Res Pract. 2014;2014:651681. doi: 10.1155/2014/651681. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
8
Association between palliative case management and utilization of inpatient, intensive care unit, emergency department, and hospice in Medicaid beneficiaries.姑息治疗病例管理与医疗补助受益人的住院、重症监护病房、急诊科和临终关怀服务利用之间的关联。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2015 Mar;32(2):216-20. doi: 10.1177/1049909113520067. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
9
Identifying patients suitable for palliative care--a descriptive analysis of enquiries using a Case Management Process Model approach.识别适合姑息治疗的患者——使用病例管理流程模型方法对咨询情况进行的描述性分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Nov 1;5:611. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-611.
10
What is case management in palliative care? An expert panel study.姑息治疗中的病例管理是什么?专家小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 18;12:163. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-163.