Sayar Adnan, Çitak Necati, Büyükkale Songül, Metin Muzaffer, Kök Abdulaziz, Yurt Sibel, Çelikten Alper, Gürses Atilla
Yedikule Thoracic Surgery and Chest Disease Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Thorac Cancer. 2013 Nov;4(4):361-368. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.12026.
Extended cervical mediastinoscopy (ECM) is a method for staging lung carcinoma. We aimed to demonstrate the impact of ECM in the staging of lung carcinoma.
Between 1998 and 2011, 159 patients with left lung carcinoma who underwent ECM simultaneously with standard cervical mediastinoscopy (SCM), were retrospectively analyzed. Until 2006, ECM had been performed routinely (n = 90, routine ECM), however, after 2006 ECM was performed only in patients selected based on computed tomography and positron emission tomography scans (n = 69, selective ECM).
Mediastinal lymph node metastasis was present in 36 patients by mediastinoscopy. Aortopulmonary window (APW) lymph node metastasis was present in 26 patients (10 in the routine group, 16 in the selective group), whereas the 10 patients who had mediastinal lymph node metastasis that could only be accessed by SCM, but had no APW lymph node metastasis, were excluded. The remaining 123 patients (72 in the routine group, 51 in the selective group) were identified as cN0/N1 by SCM/ECM, and lobectomy, pneumonectomy, and exploratory thoracotomy were performed on 64, 43, and 16 of these patients, respectively. According to the lymphadenectomy, APW lymph node metastasis was determined in 11 patients (seven in the routine group, four in the selective group). Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ECM were calculated as 0.70, 0.90, and 0.92, respectively. Staging values of routine/selective ECM protocols were 0.58/0.80, 0.89/0.91 and 0.91/0.94, respectively. The complication rate was 5% (n = 8).
ECM has an adequate NPV and accuracy in determining metastasis to the APW lymph nodes in patients with left lung carcinoma.
扩大颈部纵隔镜检查(ECM)是一种用于肺癌分期的方法。我们旨在证明ECM在肺癌分期中的作用。
对1998年至2011年间159例同时接受标准颈部纵隔镜检查(SCM)和ECM的左肺癌患者进行回顾性分析。直到2006年,ECM都是常规进行(n = 90,常规ECM),然而,2006年后,ECM仅在根据计算机断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描选择的患者中进行(n = 69,选择性ECM)。
纵隔镜检查发现36例患者存在纵隔淋巴结转移。26例患者存在主动脉肺窗(APW)淋巴结转移(常规组10例,选择性组16例),而10例仅通过SCM可触及纵隔淋巴结转移但无APW淋巴结转移的患者被排除。其余123例患者(常规组72例,选择性组51例)经SCM/ECM确定为cN0/N1,其中64例、43例和16例患者分别接受了肺叶切除术、全肺切除术和开胸探查术。根据淋巴结清扫情况,11例患者(常规组7例,选择性组4例)被确定存在APW淋巴结转移。ECM的敏感性、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性分别计算为0.70、0.90和0.92。常规/选择性ECM方案的分期价值分别为0.58/0.80、0.89/0.91和0.91/0.94。并发症发生率为5%(n = 8)。
ECM在确定左肺癌患者APW淋巴结转移方面具有足够的NPV和准确性。