Davis Christal N, Natta Shanaliz S, Slutske Wendy S
Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands.
Behav Genet. 2017 Nov;47(6):587-595. doi: 10.1007/s10519-017-9867-x. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Adolescents in rural and urban areas may experience different levels of environmental restrictions on alcohol use, with those in rural areas experiencing greater monitoring and less access to alcohol. Such restrictions may limit expression of genetic vulnerability for alcohol use, resulting in a gene-environment interaction (G × E). This phenomenon has previously been reported in Finnish and Minnesota adolescents. The current study used data from 839 same-sex twin pairs from the 1962 National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test to determine whether the G × E interaction would be evident in this earlier time period. We also assessed whether the G × E interaction would be moderated by sex, and whether family socioeconomic status (SES; income and parental education) may mediate the G × E interaction. Findings showed the expected interaction among females, with a weaker contribution of genes (2 vs. 44%) and greater contribution of shared environment (62 vs. 29%) to variation in alcohol involvement among rural as compared to urban residents. The G × E interaction was not observed among males, and operated independently from differences in family SES among rural and urban adolescents. This study represents a partial replication in a novel setting of the moderation of the genetic contribution to alcohol use by rural/urban residency, and suggests that SES differences may not explain this effect.
农村和城市地区的青少年在饮酒方面可能会受到不同程度的环境限制,农村地区的青少年受到的监管更多,获得酒精的机会更少。这种限制可能会抑制酒精使用遗传易感性的表达,从而导致基因-环境相互作用(G×E)。此前在芬兰和明尼苏达州的青少年中曾报道过这种现象。本研究使用了1962年国家优秀奖学金资格考试中839对同性双胞胎的数据,以确定在这个更早的时间段内G×E相互作用是否会明显表现出来。我们还评估了G×E相互作用是否会受到性别的调节,以及家庭社会经济地位(SES;收入和父母教育程度)是否可能介导G×E相互作用。研究结果显示,女性中出现了预期的相互作用,与城市居民相比,农村居民中基因对酒精参与度变异的贡献较弱(2%对44%),共享环境的贡献更大(62%对29%)。在男性中未观察到G×E相互作用,且该相互作用独立于农村和城市青少年家庭SES的差异。本研究在一个新的背景下部分重复了农村/城市居住环境对酒精使用遗传贡献的调节作用,并表明SES差异可能无法解释这种效应。