Department of Neurosurgery, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.
Department of Neurology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2017 Oct 1;13(5):586-595. doi: 10.1093/ons/opx064.
For some posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms, there is no constructive endovascular or direct surgical clipping option. Intracranial bypass is an alternative to a deconstructive technique.
To evaluate the clinical features, surgical techniques, and outcome of PICA aneurysms treated with bypass and obliteration of the diseased segment.
Retrospective review of PICA aneurysms treated via intracranial bypass was performed. Outcome measurements included postoperative stroke, cranial nerve deficits, gastrostomy/tracheostomy requirement, bypass patency, modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge, and mRS at 6 mo.
Seven patients with PICA aneurysms treated with intracranial bypass were identified. Five had fusiform aneurysms (4 ruptured, 1 unruptured), 1 had a giant partially thrombosed saccular aneurysm (unruptured), and 1 had a dissecting traumatic aneurysm (ruptured). Two aneurysms were at the anteromedullary segment, 4 at the lateral medullary segment, and 1 at the tonsillomedullary segment. Three patients underwent PICA-to-PICA side to side anastomoses, 2 PICA-to-PICA reanastomosis, 1 vertebral artery-to-PICA bypass, and 1 occipital artery-PICA bypass. Six out of 7 aneurysms were obliterated surgically and 1 with additional endovascular occlusion after the bypass. All bypasses were patent intraoperatively; 2 were later demonstrated occluded without radiological signs or symptoms of stroke. No patients had new cranial nerve deficit postoperatively. With the exception of 1 death due to pulmonary emboli 3 mo postoperatively, all others remain at a mRS ≤ 2.
Constructive bypass and aneurysm obliteration remains a viable alternative for treatment of PICA aneurysms not amenable to direct surgical clipping or to a vessel-preserving endovascular option.
对于一些后下小脑动脉(PICA)动脉瘤,没有可行的血管内或直接手术夹闭的选择。颅内旁路是破坏性技术的替代方案。
评估通过旁路和病变节段闭塞治疗 PICA 动脉瘤的临床特征、手术技术和结果。
对通过颅内旁路治疗的 PICA 动脉瘤进行回顾性分析。术后评估包括卒中、颅神经缺陷、胃造口术/气管造口术需求、旁路通畅性、出院时改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)和 6 个月时 mRS。
确定了 7 例接受颅内旁路治疗的 PICA 动脉瘤患者。5 例为梭形动脉瘤(4 例破裂,1 例未破裂),1 例为巨大部分血栓形成的囊状动脉瘤(未破裂),1 例为夹层创伤性动脉瘤(破裂)。2 例动脉瘤位于前髓质段,4 例位于外侧髓质段,1 例位于扁桃体髓质段。3 例患者行 PICA 对 PICA 侧侧吻合,2 例行 PICA 再吻合,1 例行椎动脉到 PICA 旁路,1 例行枕动脉到 PICA 旁路。7 个动脉瘤中有 6 个通过手术闭塞,1 个在旁路后通过血管内闭塞。所有旁路术中均通畅;2 个后来显示闭塞,无影像学卒中迹象或症状。术后无新发颅神经缺损。除 1 例术后 3 个月因肺栓塞死亡外,其余患者 mRS≤2。
对于不能直接手术夹闭或保留血管的血管内治疗的 PICA 动脉瘤,建设性旁路和动脉瘤闭塞仍然是一种可行的替代治疗方法。