Hecht Anna, Doll Seraphina, Altmann Heidi, Nowak Daniel, Lengfelder Eva, Röllig Christoph, Ehninger Gerhard, Spiekermann Karsten, Hiddemann Wolfgang, Weiß Christel, Hofmann Wolf-Karsten, Nolte Florian, Platzbecker Uwe
Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Mannheim, Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 Dec;17(12):889-896.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.08.095. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
Although treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) has evolved dramatically during the past decades, especially with the introduction of all-trans retinoic acid, risk stratification remains an important issue. To date, relapse risk can be predicted by leukocyte and platelet counts only. In the present report, we present a validation study on 3 candidate genes and a newly developed molecular risk score for APL in 2 independent patient cohorts.
An integrative risk score combining the expression levels of BAALC, ERG, and WT1 was calculated for 79 de novo APL patients from the original cohort and 76 de novo APL patients from a validation cohort. Gene expression analysis was executed the same for both cohorts, and the results regarding the effect on patient outcomes were compared.
The expression levels of BAALC, ERG, and WT1 were similar in both cohorts compared with the healthy controls. The relapse and survival rates were not different between the low- and high-risk patients according to the Sanz score. However, application of the molecular risk score on the validation cohort distinctly discriminated patients according to their risk of relapse and death just as in the original APL cohort, although single gene analyses could not reproduce the negative prognostic impact.
The analysis clearly validated the prognostic effect of the integrative risk score on the outcome in APL patients. The value was further empowered because the single gene analyses did not show similar results. Whether the integrative risk score retains its prognostic power in the chemotherapy-free setting should be investigated further.
尽管在过去几十年中急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)的治疗有了显著进展,尤其是全反式维甲酸的引入,但风险分层仍然是一个重要问题。迄今为止,复发风险仅可通过白细胞和血小板计数来预测。在本报告中,我们在2个独立的患者队列中对3个候选基因和一种新开发的APL分子风险评分进行了验证研究。
计算了来自原始队列的79例初发APL患者和来自验证队列的76例初发APL患者的综合风险评分,该评分结合了BAALC、ERG和WT1的表达水平。两个队列的基因表达分析执行方式相同,并比较了对患者预后影响的结果。
与健康对照相比,两个队列中BAALC、ERG和WT1的表达水平相似。根据Sanz评分,低风险和高风险患者的复发率和生存率没有差异。然而,在验证队列中应用分子风险评分,与原始APL队列一样,根据患者的复发和死亡风险明显区分了患者,尽管单基因分析无法重现负面预后影响。
分析明确验证了综合风险评分对APL患者预后的影响。由于单基因分析未显示类似结果,该评分的价值得到了进一步强化。综合风险评分在无化疗环境中是否保留其预后能力应进一步研究。