Crea Filippo, Libby Peter
From Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Sciences, Catholic University, Rome, Italy (F.C.); and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (P.L.).
Circulation. 2017 Sep 19;136(12):1155-1166. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029870.
Well into the 21st century, we still triage acute myocardial infarction on the basis of the presence or absence of ST-segment elevation, a century-old technology. Meanwhile, we have learned a great deal about the pathophysiology and mechanisms of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) at the clinical, pathological, cellular, and molecular levels. Contemporary imaging studies have shed new light on the mechanisms of ACS. This review discusses these advances and their implications for clinical management of the ACS for the future. Plaque rupture has dominated our thinking about ACS pathophysiology for decades. However, current evidence suggests that a sole focus on plaque rupture vastly oversimplifies this complex collection of diseases and obscures other mechanisms that may mandate different management strategies. We propose segmenting coronary artery thrombosis caused by plaque rupture into cases with or without signs of concomitant inflammation. This distinction may have substantial therapeutic implications as direct anti-inflammatory interventions for atherosclerosis emerge. Coronary artery thrombosis caused by plaque erosion may be on the rise in an era of intense lipid lowering. Identification of patients with of ACS resulting from erosion may permit a less invasive approach to management than the current standard of care. We also now recognize ACS that occur without apparent epicardial coronary artery thrombus or stenosis. Such events may arise from spasm, microvascular disease, or other pathways. Emerging management strategies may likewise apply selectively to this category of ACS. We advocate this more mechanistic approach to the categorization of ACS to provide a framework for future tailoring, triage, and therapy for patients in a more personalized and precise manner.
直至21世纪,我们仍在基于ST段抬高的有无来对急性心肌梗死进行分诊,这是一项百年前的技术。与此同时,我们在临床、病理、细胞和分子水平上对急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的病理生理学和机制有了大量了解。当代影像学研究为ACS的机制带来了新的认识。本文综述讨论了这些进展及其对未来ACS临床管理的意义。数十年来,斑块破裂主导了我们对ACS病理生理学的认识。然而,目前的证据表明,仅关注斑块破裂极大地简化了这一复杂的疾病集合,并掩盖了其他可能需要不同管理策略的机制。我们建议将由斑块破裂引起的冠状动脉血栓形成分为伴有或不伴有伴随炎症迹象的情况。随着针对动脉粥样硬化的直接抗炎干预措施的出现,这种区分可能具有重大的治疗意义。在强化降脂时代,由斑块侵蚀引起的冠状动脉血栓形成可能正在增加。识别由侵蚀导致的ACS患者可能允许采取比当前标准治疗更具侵入性较小的管理方法。我们现在还认识到无明显心外膜冠状动脉血栓或狭窄的ACS。此类事件可能由痉挛、微血管疾病或其他途径引起。新兴的管理策略同样可能选择性地应用于这类ACS。我们提倡这种更具机制性的ACS分类方法,以便为未来以更个性化和精确的方式为患者量身定制、分诊和治疗提供一个框架。