Emery Jon D, Gray Victoria, Walter Fiona M, Cheetham Shelley, Croager Emma J, Slevin Terry, Saunders Christobel, Threlfall Timothy, Auret Kirsten, Nowak Anna K, Geelhoed Elizabeth, Bulsara Max, Holman C D'Arcy J
Department of General Practice and The Centre for Cancer Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia.
Br J Cancer. 2017 Nov 7;117(10):1459-1469. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.310. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
Rural Australians have poorer survival for most common cancers, due partially to later diagnosis. Internationally, several initiatives to improve cancer outcomes have focused on earlier presentation to healthcare and timely diagnosis. We aimed to measure the effect of community-based symptom awareness and general practice-based educational interventions on the time to diagnosis in rural patients presenting with breast, prostate, colorectal or lung cancer in Western Australia.
2 × 2 factorial cluster randomised controlled trial. Community Intervention: cancer symptom awareness campaign tailored for rural Australians. GP intervention: resource card with symptom risk assessment charts and local cancer referral pathways implemented through multiple academic detailing visits. Trial Area A received the community symptom awareness and Trial Area B acted as the community campaign control region. Within both Trial Areas general practices were randomised to the GP intervention or control.
total diagnostic interval (TDI).
1358 people with incident breast, prostate, colorectal or lung cancer were recruited. There were no significant differences in the median or ln mean TDI at either intervention level (community intervention vs control: median TDI 107.5 vs 92 days; ln mean difference 0.08 95% CI -0.06-0.23 P=0.27; GP intervention vs control: median TDI 97 vs 96.5 days; ln mean difference 0.004 95% CI -0.18-0.19 P=0.99). There were no significant differences in the TDI when analysed by factorial design, tumour group or sub-intervals of the TDI.
This is the largest trial to test the effect of community campaign or GP interventions on timeliness of cancer diagnosis. We found no effect of either intervention. This may reflect limited dose of the interventions, or the limited duration of follow-up. Alternatively, these interventions do not have a measurable effect on time to cancer diagnosis.
澳大利亚农村地区居民在大多数常见癌症方面的生存率较低,部分原因是诊断较晚。在国际上,多项改善癌症治疗效果的举措都聚焦于更早地寻求医疗服务以及及时诊断。我们旨在评估以社区为基础的症状知晓度干预和以全科医疗为基础的教育干预对西澳大利亚州农村地区乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌患者诊断时间的影响。
2×2析因整群随机对照试验。社区干预:为澳大利亚农村居民量身定制的癌症症状知晓度宣传活动。全科医生干预:通过多次学术详述访问实施带有症状风险评估图表和当地癌症转诊途径的资源卡。试验区A接受社区症状知晓度干预,试验区B作为社区宣传活动的对照区域。在两个试验区内,全科医疗随机分为接受全科医生干预组或对照组。
总诊断间隔(TDI)。
招募了1358例新发乳腺癌、前列腺癌、结直肠癌或肺癌患者。在任何一个干预水平上,中位或自然对数平均TDI均无显著差异(社区干预组与对照组:中位TDI分别为107.5天和92天;自然对数平均差异为0.08,95%可信区间为-0.06至0.23,P = 0.27;全科医生干预组与对照组:中位TDI分别为97天和96.5天;自然对数平均差异为0.004,95%可信区间为-0.18至0.19,P = 0.99)。按析因设计、肿瘤组或TDI的子区间分析时,TDI均无显著差异。
这是测试社区宣传活动或全科医生干预对癌症诊断及时性影响的最大规模试验。我们发现两种干预均无效果。这可能反映出干预剂量有限,或随访时间有限。或者,这些干预对癌症诊断时间没有可测量的影响。