Suppr超能文献

随机对照 2 期临床试验中索罗霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染的肠道微生物组特征。

Enteric microbiome profiles during a randomized Phase 2 clinical trial of surotomycin versus vancomycin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection.

机构信息

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Dec 1;72(12):3453-3461. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx318.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The effects of surotomycin (CB-183,315, MK-4261), a bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide, and vancomycin, the current standard-of-care for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), on intestinal pathogens and microbiota were evaluated parallel to a Phase 2 randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

METHODS

The single-centre cohort included 26 patients receiving surotomycin [125 or 250 mg twice daily (n = 9 each)] or oral vancomycin [125 mg four times daily (n = 8)] for 10 days. Faecal samples were collected at days 0-42 to quantify both C. difficile by conventional culture and the major components of the microbiome by quantitative PCR.

RESULTS

Surotomycin 250 mg twice daily or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily reduced faecal C. difficile counts from ∼105-107 log10 cfu/g at baseline to ≤ 102 cfu/g by days 4-10 of treatment. Day 10 counts of C. difficile in 3/9 patients receiving surotomycin 125 mg twice daily remained detectable, including one patient who failed to achieve clinical cure. Bacteroidetes and Prevotella mean counts increased 0.7 log10 or remained unchanged with surotomycin 125 and 250 mg twice daily, respectively, whereas vancomycin reduced counts by 2.5-3.2 log10 (P < 0.02). Vancomycin reduced Firmicutes counts by 2.5-2.8 log10; surotomycin moderately suppressed these microbes in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

In this Phase 2 trial substudy, compared with vancomycin 125 mg four times daily, surotomycin 250 mg twice daily is as active in vivo against C. difficile, but was more sparing of microbiota. Surotomycin is no longer in development due to failed Phase 3 efficacy results.

摘要

目的

苏罗替莫司(CB-183,315, MK-4261)是一种杀菌性环脂肽,万古霉素是治疗艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的标准疗法。本研究平行开展了一项 2 期随机、双盲临床试验,评估了苏罗替莫司和万古霉素对肠道病原体和微生物群的影响。

方法

该单中心队列纳入了 26 例接受苏罗替莫司(125 或 250mg,每日 2 次,n=9)或口服万古霉素(125mg,每日 4 次,n=8)治疗 10 天的患者。于第 0-42 天采集粪便样本,通过传统培养定量检测艰难梭菌,通过定量 PCR 检测微生物组的主要成分。

结果

苏罗替莫司 250mg,每日 2 次或万古霉素 125mg,每日 4 次可使基线时约 105-107log10cfu/g 的粪便艰难梭菌计数在治疗第 4-10 天降至≤102cfu/g。苏罗替莫司 125mg,每日 2 次治疗的 9 例患者中有 3 例(33%)第 10 天粪便艰难梭菌仍可检出,其中 1 例患者未达到临床治愈。苏罗替莫司 125mg 和 250mg,每日 2 次分别使拟杆菌门和普雷沃氏菌属平均计数增加 0.7log10 或无变化,而万古霉素使计数减少 2.5-3.2log10(P<0.02)。万古霉素使梭菌属计数减少 2.5-2.8log10;苏罗替莫司以剂量依赖性方式适度抑制这些微生物。

结论

在这项 2 期试验亚研究中,与万古霉素 125mg,每日 4 次相比,苏罗替莫司 250mg,每日 2 次在体内对艰难梭菌同样有效,但对微生物群的抑制作用更小。由于 3 期疗效结果失败,苏罗替莫司不再开发。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验