Suppr超能文献

苏拉托霉素与万古霉素治疗艰难梭菌感染:2期随机对照双盲非劣效性多中心试验

Surotomycin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: Phase 2, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority, multicentre trial.

作者信息

Lee Christine H, Patino Hernando, Stevens Chris, Rege Shruta, Chesnel Laurent, Louie Thomas, Mullane Kathleen M

机构信息

St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada Island Health Authority, Royal Jubilee Hospital, 1952 Bay St, Victoria BC V8R 1J8, Canada

Merck and Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ 07033, USA.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Oct;71(10):2964-71. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw246. Epub 2016 Jul 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major public health concern. Treatment with commonly prescribed antibiotics is associated with high rates of recurrence after initial cure. Here, we present the efficacy and safety of surotomycin, an orally administered, minimally absorbed, selective bactericidal cyclic lipopeptide, compared with vancomycin, in patients with CDI.

METHODS

In this Phase 2, randomized, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority, multicentre trial, participants received surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, surotomycin 250 mg twice daily or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily for 10 days. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical response at end of treatment. The registration number of the study on clinicaltrials.gov is NCT01085591.

RESULTS

Clinical cure rates were similar among treatment groups (92.4% for surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, 86.6% for surotomycin 250 mg twice daily and 89.4% for vancomycin). Recurrence rates were 27.9% for surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, 17.2% for surotomycin 250 mg twice daily and 35.6% for vancomycin. The lower recurrence rate with surotomycin 250 mg twice daily versus vancomycin was statistically significant (P = 0.035). Recurrence rates were statistically similar between the surotomycin dose groups (P = 0.193). Rates of sustained clinical response at end of study were 66.7% for surotomycin 125 mg twice daily, 70.1% for surotomycin 250 mg twice daily and 56.1% for vancomycin. Incidence of adverse events was similar among treatment arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence rates of CDI were lower with surotomycin with higher sustained clinical response rates compared with vancomycin, both of which may offer potential clinical benefits.

摘要

目的

艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是一个重大的公共卫生问题。常用抗生素治疗在初始治愈后复发率很高。在此,我们展示了与万古霉素相比,口服给药、吸收极少的选择性杀菌环脂肽舒洛霉素在CDI患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项2期、随机、对照、双盲、非劣效性、多中心试验中,参与者接受每日两次125mg舒洛霉素、每日两次250mg舒洛霉素或每日四次125mg万古霉素治疗10天。主要疗效结局是治疗结束时的临床反应。该研究在clinicaltrials.gov上的注册号为NCT01085591。

结果

各治疗组的临床治愈率相似(每日两次125mg舒洛霉素组为92.4%,每日两次250mg舒洛霉素组为86.6%,万古霉素组为89.4%)。每日两次125mg舒洛霉素组的复发率为27.9%,每日两次250mg舒洛霉素组为17.2%,万古霉素组为35.6%。每日两次250mg舒洛霉素组与万古霉素组相比,较低的复发率具有统计学意义(P = 0.035)。舒洛霉素剂量组之间的复发率在统计学上相似(P = 0.193)。研究结束时持续临床反应率分别为:每日两次125mg舒洛霉素组为66.7%,每日两次250mg舒洛霉素组为70.1%,万古霉素组为56.1%。各治疗组不良事件发生率相似。

结论

与万古霉素相比,舒洛霉素治疗CDI的复发率更低,持续临床反应率更高,两者都可能带来潜在的临床益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验