Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Sep 19;10(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2371-6.
As the arboviral diseases dengue, chikungunya and Zika emerge in the Americas, so does the need for sustainable vector control policies. To successfully achieve mosquito control, joint efforts of both communities and governments are essential. This study investigates this important, but by-and-large neglected topic.
In June and July 2015, a cross-sectional mixed methods study applying a survey questionnaire (response rate of 82.5%; n = 339), in-depth interviews (n = 20) and focus group discussions (n = 7; 50 participants) was performed in Curaçao. The study was designed based on an integrated theoretical framework of the Health Belief Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour.
Participants showed a good knowledge of, and a high-level performance of mosquito breeding site control (MBSC) practices. Personal protection against mosquitoes (e.g. topical repellents) was perceived as relatively less effective thus practiced to lower extent compared to MBSC practices (i.e. larval source management). A lower intention to perform MBSC was independently associated with: (i) satisfaction on governmental MBSC (P = 0.012); (ii) barriers to perform MBSC practices, i.e. 'Government doesn't control other breeding sites' (P = 0.005), 'Don't know how to control breeding sites' (P = 0.041), and 'a mosquito does not transmit dengue' (P = 0.016), (iii) attitudes towards MBSC (P = 0.001) and self-efficacy (person's perceived ability to act) to perform MBSC (P = 0.002). Mixed-methods evidence highlights three possible ways of improving community participation in MBSC. First, it highlights the need for ongoing media coverage, targeting (i) communities' perceptions on transmission routes of dengue and chikungunya, and (ii) presence of car tires in yards. Secondly, it shows that promotion of governmental activities in MBSC can enhance MBSC of communities, if people develop a sense of responsibility to perform MBSC at their own properties. Thirdly, this study describes the presence of key persons in communities, who could be engaged in mosquito control policies to improve MBSC in neighbourhoods.
This study reveals gaps between policy and communities' lived realities. These gaps might be overcome with the proposed interventions, resulting in a higher performance of MBSC in the community in Curaçao. Furthermore, this study shows how interdisciplinary mixed methods research can provide important, comprehensive, and in-depth insights to inform mosquito control policies.
随着登革热、基孔肯雅热和寨卡等虫媒病毒疾病在美洲出现,可持续的病媒控制政策的需求也随之出现。要成功实现蚊虫控制,社区和政府的共同努力是必不可少的。本研究调查了这个重要但在很大程度上被忽视的话题。
2015 年 6 月至 7 月,在库拉索岛进行了一项横断面混合方法研究,采用问卷调查(回应率为 82.5%;n=339)、深入访谈(n=20)和焦点小组讨论(n=7;50 名参与者)。该研究是基于健康信念模型和计划行为理论的综合理论框架设计的。
参与者对蚊虫滋生地控制(MBSC)实践表现出良好的知识和高水平的表现。个人对蚊虫的保护(例如,局部驱虫剂)被认为效果相对较低,因此与 MBSC 实践(即幼虫源管理)相比,实施程度较低。较低的 MBSC 意向与以下因素独立相关:(i)对政府 MBSC 的满意度(P=0.012);(ii)实施 MBSC 实践的障碍,即“政府不控制其他滋生地”(P=0.005)、“不知道如何控制滋生地”(P=0.041)和“蚊子不会传播登革热”(P=0.016),(i)对 MBSC 的态度(P=0.001)和实施 MBSC 的自我效能(个人实施行为的感知能力)(P=0.002)。混合方法证据突出了改善社区参与 MBSC 的三种可能途径。首先,它强调需要持续的媒体报道,针对(i)社区对登革热和基孔肯雅热传播途径的看法,以及(ii)院子里有汽车轮胎的情况。其次,它表明,如果人们对在自己的房产上进行 MBSC 有责任感,那么促进政府在 MBSC 中的活动可以增强社区的 MBSC。第三,本研究描述了社区中关键人物的存在,他们可以参与蚊虫控制政策,以改善邻里的 MBSC。
本研究揭示了政策与社区现实之间的差距。通过拟议的干预措施,这些差距可能会得到弥补,从而提高库拉索岛社区的 MBSC 绩效。此外,本研究展示了如何通过跨学科混合方法研究提供重要、全面和深入的见解,以为蚊虫控制政策提供信息。