School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Québec Public Health Research Centre, Montréal, Canada.
Trials. 2020 Feb 14;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3714-8.
Dengue is increasing in its global presence with an estimated 4 billion people at-risk of infection in at least 128 countries. Despite the promising results of EcoHealth and community mobilization approaches to Aedes reduction, more evidence of their efficacy on reducing dengue risk is needed. The principal research question is to determine if interventions based upon community mobilization reduce the risk of dengue virus infection among children 3 to 9 years old compared to usual dengue control practice in Fortaleza, Brazil.
The present study will follow a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) design with randomization at the census tract level with equal allocation to the two arms. In each arm, there will be 34 clusters of 86 children between 3 to 9 years old for an expected total of 5848 children enrolled in the study, assuming a risk reduction of 29.5% based upon findings from a previous multi-site cRCT. The primary outcomes are rates of anti-dengue Immunoglobulin G (IgG) seroconversion and adult female Aedes density. The intervention is based upon a participatory health research approach, Socializing Evidence for Participatory Action (SEPA), where the research evidence is used to foster community engagement and ownership of the health issue and solution. Following allocation, intervention communities will develop and implement their own solutions that will likely include a wide variety of collective events and media approaches. Data collection activities over a period of 3 years include household visits for blood collection, household surveys, and entomological surveys; and qualitative activities including focus groups, in-depth interviews, and document analysis to evaluate the process, acceptability, fidelity, and sustainability of the intervention. Study participants will be aware of their assignment and all research staff will be blinded although the intervention assignment will likely be revealed to field staff through interaction with participants.
The results of our study will provide evidence on community mobilization as an intervention for dengue control. We anticipate that if community mobilization is effective in Fortaleza, the results of this study will help develop evidence-based vector control programs in Brazil, and also in other countries struggling with Aedes-transmitted diseases.
ISRCTN66131315, registration date: 1 October 2018.
登革热在全球范围内呈上升趋势,至少有 128 个国家的 40 亿人面临感染风险。尽管生态健康和社区动员方法在减少伊蚊方面取得了有希望的结果,但仍需要更多证据证明它们在降低登革热风险方面的效果。主要研究问题是确定基于社区动员的干预措施是否能降低巴西福塔莱萨儿童(3 至 9 岁)感染登革热病毒的风险,与常规登革热控制措施相比。
本研究将采用实用的集群随机对照试验(cRCT)设计,在整群随机化水平上进行随机分组,两组分配比例相等。在每个组中,将有 34 个 86 名 3 至 9 岁儿童的群集,预计总共将有 5848 名儿童参加该研究,假设基于之前多地点 cRCT 的发现,风险降低 29.5%。主要结局指标是抗登革热免疫球蛋白 G(IgG)血清转化率和成年雌性伊蚊密度。干预措施基于参与式健康研究方法,即社会推广参与行动(SEPA),其中研究证据用于促进社区参与和对健康问题和解决方案的所有权。分配后,干预社区将制定和实施自己的解决方案,这些解决方案可能包括各种集体活动和媒体方法。在 3 年的时间内,将开展包括家访采集血液、家庭调查和昆虫学调查在内的数据收集活动,以及包括焦点小组、深入访谈和文件分析在内的定性活动,以评估干预措施的过程、可接受性、保真度和可持续性。研究参与者将意识到自己的分组,所有研究人员都将被蒙蔽,尽管通过与参与者的互动,现场工作人员可能会了解到干预分组。
我们的研究结果将提供社区动员作为登革热控制干预措施的证据。我们预计,如果社区动员在福塔莱萨有效,这项研究的结果将有助于在巴西以及其他与埃及伊蚊传播疾病作斗争的国家制定基于证据的病媒控制计划。
ISRCTN661315,注册日期:2018 年 10 月 1 日。