Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Leuven Autism Research (LAuRes), KU Leuven, Leuven, 3000, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 19;7(1):11851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12204-x.
We explored the strength of implicit social inferences in adolescents with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) using a chasing paradigm in which participants judged the absence/presence of a chase within a display of four seemingly randomly moving dots. While two of these dots always moved randomly, the two others could fulfill the role of being either the chasing (wolf) or chased (sheep) dot. In the chase-present (but not the chase-absent) trials the wolf displayed chasing behavior defined by the degree to which the dot reliably moved towards the sheep (chasing subtlety). Previous research indicated that chasing subtlety strongly influenced chase detection in typically developing (TD) adults. We intended to replicate and extend this finding to adolescents with and without ASD, while also adding either a social or a non-social cue to the displays. Our results confirmed the importance of chasing subtlety and indicated that adding social, but not non-social, information further improved chase detection performance. Interestingly, the performance of adolescents with ASD was less dependent on chasing subtlety than that of their TD counterparts. Nonetheless, adolescents with and without ASD did not differ in their use of the added social (or non-social) cue.
我们使用追逐范式探索了具有和不具有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的青少年的内隐社会推理的强度,在该范式中,参与者判断在四个看似随机移动的点的显示中是否存在追逐。虽然其中两个点总是随机移动,但另外两个点可以充当追逐(狼)或被追逐(羊)点。在追逐存在(但不是追逐不存在)的试验中,狼表现出由点可靠地向羊移动的程度定义的追逐行为(追逐微妙性)。先前的研究表明,追逐微妙性强烈影响了典型发育(TD)成年人的追逐检测。我们打算复制并扩展这一发现到具有和不具有 ASD 的青少年中,同时在显示中添加社交或非社交线索。我们的结果证实了追逐微妙性的重要性,并表明添加社交信息(而不是非社交信息)进一步提高了追逐检测性能。有趣的是,ASD 青少年的表现对追逐微妙性的依赖性不如他们的 TD 同龄人强。尽管如此,具有和不具有 ASD 的青少年在使用添加的社交(或非社交)线索方面没有差异。