Van de Cruys Sander, Evers Kris, Van der Hallen Ruth, Van Eylen Lien, Boets Bart, de-Wit Lee, Wagemans Johan
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, KU Leuven.
Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Leuven Autism Research, KU Leuven.
Psychol Rev. 2014 Oct;121(4):649-75. doi: 10.1037/a0037665.
There have been numerous attempts to explain the enigma of autism, but existing neurocognitive theories often provide merely a refined description of 1 cluster of symptoms. Here we argue that deficits in executive functioning, theory of mind, and central coherence can all be understood as the consequence of a core deficit in the flexibility with which people with autism spectrum disorder can process violations to their expectations. More formally we argue that the human mind processes information by making and testing predictions and that the errors resulting from violations to these predictions are given a uniform, inflexibly high weight in autism spectrum disorder. The complex, fluctuating nature of regularities in the world and the stochastic and noisy biological system through which people experience it require that, in the real world, people not only learn from their errors but also need to (meta-)learn to sometimes ignore errors. Especially when situations (e.g., social) or stimuli (e.g., faces) become too complex or dynamic, people need to tolerate a certain degree of error in order to develop a more abstract level of representation. Starting from an inability to flexibly process prediction errors, a number of seemingly core deficits become logically secondary symptoms. Moreover, an insistence on sameness or the acting out of stereotyped and repetitive behaviors can be understood as attempts to provide a reassuring sense of predictive success in a world otherwise filled with error. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
人们已多次尝试解释自闭症之谜,但现有的神经认知理论往往只是对某一组症状进行了细化描述。在此,我们认为,执行功能、心理理论和中心连贯性方面的缺陷,都可以理解为自闭症谱系障碍患者在处理对其预期的违背时缺乏灵活性这一核心缺陷的后果。更正式地说,我们认为人类思维通过做出和检验预测来处理信息,而在自闭症谱系障碍中,对这些预测的违背所导致的错误会被赋予统一的、高度僵化的权重。现实世界中规律的复杂多变性,以及人们体验世界的随机且嘈杂的生物系统,都要求在现实世界中,人们不仅要从错误中学习,还需要(元)学习有时忽略错误。尤其是当情境(如社交情境)或刺激(如面孔)变得过于复杂或动态时,人们需要容忍一定程度的错误,以便形成更抽象的表征水平。从无法灵活处理预测错误出发,一些看似核心的缺陷就会在逻辑上成为次要症状。此外,对一致性的坚持或刻板重复行为的表现,可以理解为是在一个充满错误的世界中,试图提供一种令人安心的预测成功感。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2014 美国心理学会,保留所有权利)