Saadalla Ayman Eskander T, Khalifa Osama Yehia A
Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Zagazig Medical Faculty, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):554-557. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_210_16.
No drug, used as adjuvant to spinal bupivacaine, has yet been identified that specifically inhibits nociception without its associated side effects.
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl with spinal bupivacaine in inguinal hernioplasty.
Sixty patients of inguinal hernioplasty were randomly allocated to one of three groups, Group C ( = 20) - the patients received 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 0.5 ml saline. Group D - ( = 20) the patients received 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 10 μg dexmedetomidine diluted with 0.5 ml saline. Group F ( = 20) - the patients received 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine + 25 μg fentanyl (0.5 ml). Onset, duration of anesthesia, degree of sedation, and side effects were recorded.
The onset of anesthesia was shorter in Groups D and F as compared with the control Group C, but it was shorter in Group D than in Group F. The duration of sensory and motor block was prolonged in Group D and F as compared with the control Group C, but it was longer in Group D than in Group F. The postoperative analgesic consumption in the first 24 h was lower in Groups D and F than in Group C, and it was lower in Group D than in Group F.
Onset of anesthesia is more rapid and duration is longer with less need for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty under spinal anesthesia with dexmedetomidine and fentanyl than those with spinal alone with tendency of dexmedetomidine to produce faster onset, longer duration, and less analgesic need than fentanyl with similar safety profile.
尚未发现有药物作为脊髓布比卡因的辅助用药,能在不产生相关副作用的情况下特异性抑制伤害感受。
本研究旨在比较右美托咪定和芬太尼与脊髓布比卡因用于腹股沟疝修补术的疗效。
60例腹股沟疝修补术患者被随机分为三组,C组(n = 20)——患者接受15mg高压布比卡因 + 0.5ml生理盐水。D组(n = 20)——患者接受15mg高压布比卡因 + 用0.5ml生理盐水稀释的10μg右美托咪定。F组(n = 20)——患者接受15mg高压布比卡因 + 25μg芬太尼(0.5ml)。记录麻醉起效时间、麻醉持续时间、镇静程度及副作用。
与对照组C组相比,D组和F组的麻醉起效时间更短,但D组比F组更短。与对照组C组相比,D组和F组的感觉和运动阻滞持续时间延长,但D组比F组更长。D组和F组术后24小时的镇痛药物消耗量低于C组,且D组低于F组。
在脊髓麻醉下接受腹股沟疝修补术的患者中,与单纯使用脊髓布比卡因相比,使用右美托咪定和芬太尼时麻醉起效更快、持续时间更长,术后镇痛需求更少,且右美托咪定与芬太尼相比有起效更快、持续时间更长及镇痛需求更少的趋势,安全性相似。