Nigam Shuchi, Rastogi Shivani, Tyagi Amit, Bhandari Rajlakshmi
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Vivekananda Polyclinic and Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):692-696. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_254_16.
Different adjuvants are coadministered with local anesthetics to improve the speed of onset and duration of analgesia, and to reduce the dose, the selection of which is often left to the choice of an anesthesiologist.
The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of fentanyl and clonidine as an adjuvant to epidural ropivacaine anesthesia.
With institutional ethical committee clearance, a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind clinical study was conducted at Vivekananda Polyclinic and Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow.
Two groups with thirty patients each were randomly allocated to receive 15-20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine with 75 μg clonidine or 15-20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine with 75 μg fentanyl, respectively. Block characteristics such as onset of analgesia, maximum level of sensory blockade, complete motor blockade, hemodynamic, time to two-segment regressions, time for rescue analgesia, time to complete motor recovery, and side effects were analyzed.
Results showed that the onset of blockade is faster when fentanyl is used as additives. Time for two-segment regression was earlier in fentanyl group but time for rescue analgesia was longer in clonidine group.
Two groups were compared by Student's -test and Chi-square test; ANOVA and significance of mean difference bet were done by Newman-Keuls test.
Addition of clonidine to epidural ropivacaine provides superior analgesia than the addition of fentanyl to epidural ropivacaine without much difference in side effect profile.
不同的佐剂与局部麻醉药联合使用,以提高镇痛起效速度和持续时间,并减少剂量,其选择通常由麻醉医生决定。
本研究旨在比较芬太尼和可乐定作为硬膜外罗哌卡因麻醉佐剂的镇痛效果和安全性。
经机构伦理委员会批准,在勒克瑙的维韦卡南达综合诊所和医学科学研究所进行了一项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照双盲临床研究。
将两组各30例患者随机分配,分别接受15 - 20 ml含75μg可乐定的0.75%罗哌卡因或15 - 20 ml含75μg芬太尼的0.75%罗哌卡因。分析阻滞特征,如镇痛起效时间、感觉阻滞最高平面、完全运动阻滞、血流动力学、两段消退时间、补救镇痛时间、运动完全恢复时间及副作用。
结果显示,使用芬太尼作为添加剂时阻滞起效更快。芬太尼组两段消退时间更早,但可乐定组补救镇痛时间更长。
两组采用学生t检验和卡方检验进行比较;方差分析和平均差别的显著性采用纽曼 - 基尔斯检验。
硬膜外罗哌卡因中添加可乐定比添加芬太尼提供更好的镇痛效果,且副作用方面无明显差异。