Ratnani Ekta, Sanjeev Om Prakash, Singh Abhishek, Tripathi Manoj, Chourasia Hemant Kumar
Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. RML Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Orthopaedics, Vivekananda Polyclinic, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):745-750. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_9_17.
Direct layngoscopy and endotracheal intubation is a noxious stimuli and induces sympathomimetic responses. Although well tolerated in healthy subjects, it may impose life threatening arrhythmias, left ventricular failure or rupture of cerebral aneurysm in susceptible patients. Esmolol, Labetalol and Lignocaine attenuate these responses but are associated with side effects of bradycardia, hypotension etc. In lower doses, chances of these side effects are comparatively low. So we designed this prospective clinical trial to assess the efficacy of intravenous esmolol, labetalol and lignocaine in low doses for attenuation of sympathomimetic responses to endotracheal intubation.
Seventy-five consenting patients of ASA physical status I or II of age range 20 to 60 years, scheduled for different general surgical procedures were randomly assigned to one of the three groups; group ES, group LB and group LG. Participants of group ES, group LB and group LG was given esmolol HCL 0.5 mg/Kg, labetalol HCL 0.25 mg/kg and lignocaine HCL 1 mg/Kg body weight respectively. Outcome variables were HR, SBP, DBP, MAP and RPP. These variables were recorded just after intubation and thereafter at 1,3,5, 7 and 10 minutes of intubation.
There was no statistically significant difference regarding the demographic characteristics of the groups. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure was lower throughout the study period in labetalol group. But the values of study parameters were always higher than the baseline in esmolol and lignocaine group. Values of mean arterial pressure was slightly higher in labetalol group but it was much higher in two other groups throughout the study period. Diastolic blood pressure was higher in all the groups. Values of rate pressure product was higher during intubation and at 1minute after intubation in labetalol group but thereafter it was always lower than baseline values.
Labetalol 0.25 mg Kg is an effective and safe drug to be used for attenuation of sympathomimetic responses to endotracheal intubation. Esmolol 0.5 mg Kg and lignocaine 1 mg Kg are also effective to some extent and are safe.
直接喉镜检查和气管插管是一种有害刺激,可诱发拟交感神经反应。尽管在健康受试者中耐受性良好,但在易感患者中可能会引发危及生命的心律失常、左心室衰竭或脑动脉瘤破裂。艾司洛尔、拉贝洛尔和利多卡因可减轻这些反应,但会伴有心动过缓、低血压等副作用。较低剂量时,这些副作用的发生几率相对较低。因此,我们设计了这项前瞻性临床试验,以评估低剂量静脉注射艾司洛尔、拉贝洛尔和利多卡因对减轻气管插管拟交感神经反应的疗效。
75例年龄在20至60岁、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况分级为I或II级、计划进行不同普外科手术的患者,被随机分为三组:ES组、LB组和LG组。ES组、LB组和LG组的参与者分别给予盐酸艾司洛尔0.5mg/kg、盐酸拉贝洛尔0.25mg/kg和盐酸利多卡因1mg/kg体重。观察指标为心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)和率压积(RPP)。这些指标在插管后即刻以及插管后1、3、5、7和10分钟记录。
各组的人口统计学特征无统计学显著差异。在整个研究期间,拉贝洛尔组的心率和收缩压较低。但艾司洛尔组和利多卡因组的研究参数值始终高于基线。拉贝洛尔组的平均动脉压值略高,但在整个研究期间,其他两组的平均动脉压值要高得多。所有组的舒张压均较高。拉贝洛尔组在插管时及插管后1分钟的率压积值较高,但此后始终低于基线值。
0.25mg/kg的拉贝洛尔是一种有效且安全的药物,可用于减轻气管插管的拟交感神经反应。0.5mg/kg的艾司洛尔和1mg/kg的利多卡因在一定程度上也有效且安全。