• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

维度强迫症量表:简版(DOCS-SF)的编制与验证

The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Form (DOCS-SF).

作者信息

Eilertsen Thomas, Hansen Bjarne, Kvale Gerd, Abramowitz Jonathan S, Holm Silje E H, Solem Stian

机构信息

OCD-Team, Haukeland University HospitalBergen, Norway.

Department of Clinical Psychology, University of BergenBergen, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 5;8:1503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01503. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01503
PMID:28928693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5591872/
Abstract

Accurately and reliably measuring the presence and severity of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) symptoms is essential for both routine clinical work and research. The current study investigated psychometric properties of the dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale-short form (DOCS-SF). DOCS-SF was developed and validated in Norwegian. DOCS-SF contains a checklist with four symptom categories and five severity items scored on a zero to eight scale yielding a total score of 0-40. Data were collected from adults with a current diagnosis of OCD ( = 204) and a community comparison group ( = 211). The results provided evidence of internal consistency and convergent validity, although evidence for discriminant validity was mixed. Evidence was also found for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, and treatment sensitivity. The analyses suggested a cut-off score of 16. In summary, the data obtained proved similar to studies published on the original dimensional obsessive-compulsive scale. There is strong evidence for the reliability and validity of the DOCS-SF for assessing OCD symptoms in individuals with this condition and in non-clinical individuals.

摘要

准确可靠地测量强迫症(OCD)症状的存在与否及其严重程度,对于日常临床工作和研究都至关重要。本研究调查了维度强迫症量表简版(DOCS-SF)的心理测量特性。DOCS-SF是在挪威开发并验证的。DOCS-SF包含一个清单,有四个症状类别和五个严重程度项目,按0至8分评分,总分0至40分。数据收集自目前被诊断为强迫症的成年人(n = 204)和一个社区对照组(n = 211)。结果提供了内部一致性和收敛效度的证据,尽管区分效度的证据好坏参半。还发现了诊断敏感性和特异性以及治疗敏感性的证据。分析表明临界值为16分。总之,所获得的数据与在原始维度强迫症量表上发表的研究结果相似。有充分证据表明DOCS-SF在评估患有这种疾病的个体和非临床个体的强迫症症状方面具有可靠性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3c9/5591872/291951cabb83/fpsyg-08-01503-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3c9/5591872/291951cabb83/fpsyg-08-01503-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3c9/5591872/291951cabb83/fpsyg-08-01503-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: Development and Validation of a Short Form (DOCS-SF).维度强迫症量表:简版(DOCS-SF)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 5;8:1503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01503. eCollection 2017.
2
Spanish version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): psychometric properties and relation to obsessive beliefs.西班牙语版多维强迫量表(DOCS):心理测量特性及其与强迫观念的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;55(1):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
3
[Dimensional Approach to Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale with Turkish Psychometric Properties].[强迫症的维度研究方法:具有土耳其心理测量特性的维度强迫症量表]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2018 Summer;29(2):122-130.
4
A New Scrupulosity Scale for the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): Validation With Clinical and Nonclinical Samples.用于多维强迫量表(DOCS)的新谨小慎微量表:对临床和非临床样本的验证。
Behav Ther. 2021 Nov;52(6):1449-1463. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Discriminative Validity of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale for Separating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder From Anxiety Disorders.维度强迫症量表在区分强迫症与焦虑症方面的区分效度
Assessment. 2020 Jun;27(4):810-821. doi: 10.1177/1073191118791039. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
6
Secondary Psychometric Examination of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: Classical Testing, Item Response Theory, and Differential Item Functioning.维度强迫症量表的二次心理测量检验:经典测试、项目反应理论和项目功能差异
Assessment. 2015 Dec;22(6):681-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191114559123. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
7
Rethinking Unacceptable Thoughts: Validation of an Expanded Version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.重新思考不可接受的想法:多维强迫量表扩展版的验证。
Behav Ther. 2024 Jul;55(4):786-800. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.11.003. Epub 2023 Dec 5.
8
Criterion Validity of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Second Edition for Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Adults.耶鲁-布朗强迫量表第二版用于成人强迫症诊断的效标效度
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 11;9:431. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00431. eCollection 2018.
9
[Validation of a scale for responsibility (Salkovskis Responsibility Scale)].[责任量表(索尔科夫斯基责任量表)的验证]
Encephale. 2001 May-Jun;27(3):229-37.
10
Validation of the Bangla version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.验证孟加拉语版的多维强迫量表。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Oct;37:136-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Remission of obsessive-compulsive disorder using ketogenic metabolic therapy in support of exposure and response prevention: a retrospective case report.使用生酮代谢疗法辅助暴露与反应预防治疗强迫症的缓解:一项回顾性病例报告。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 20;16:1555591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1555591. eCollection 2025.
2
Patterns of childhood trauma co-occurrence and its predictivity for suicidality: A machine learning approach.儿童期创伤共现模式及其对自杀倾向的预测性:一种机器学习方法。
iScience. 2025 Jan 28;28(2):111877. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.111877. eCollection 2025 Feb 21.
3
The lasting effects of childhood trauma on developing psychiatric symptoms: A population-based, large-scale comparison study.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring mental well-being in Norway: validation of the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS).挪威心理健康状况的测量:沃里克 - 爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)的效度验证
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 12;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1343-x.
2
Towards an international expert consensus for defining treatment response, remission, recovery and relapse in obsessive-compulsive disorder.迈向关于强迫症治疗反应、缓解、康复及复发定义的国际专家共识。
World Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;15(1):80-1. doi: 10.1002/wps.20299.
3
Defining clinical severity in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
童年创伤对精神症状发展的长期影响:一项基于人群的大规模比较研究。
Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2024 Oct 24;11:e98. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2024.100. eCollection 2024.
4
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Medical School Curriculum and Textbook Review.强迫症:医学院课程与教材综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2024 Mar 27;11:23821205241242262. doi: 10.1177/23821205241242262. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
Changes in contamination-related obsessions and compulsions during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Norwegian longitudinal study.新冠疫情期间与污染相关的强迫观念和强迫行为的变化:一项挪威纵向研究。
J Obsessive Compuls Relat Disord. 2022 Oct;35:100758. doi: 10.1016/j.jocrd.2022.100758. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Cohort Profile: COVIDMENT: COVID-19 cohorts on mental health across six nations.队列简介:COVIDMENT:六个国家关于心理健康的COVID-19队列研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Jun 13;51(3):e108-e122. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab234.
7
Screening for Perinatal OCD: A Comparison of the DOCS and the EPDS.围产期强迫症筛查:DOCS 和 EPDS 的比较。
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):1028-1039. doi: 10.1177/10731911211063223. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
8
Recognizing obsessive-compulsive disorder: how suitable is the German Zohar-Fineberg obsessive-compulsive screen?识别强迫症:德国 Zohar-Fineberg 强迫症筛查表的适用性如何?
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 11;21(1):450. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03458-x.
9
Low intensity technology-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a meta-analysis.低强度技术传递的认知行为疗法治疗强迫症:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03272-5.
10
Effect of D-Cycloserine on the Effect of Concentrated Exposure and Response Prevention in Difficult-to-Treat Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.D-环丝氨酸对集中暴露和反应预防治疗难治性强迫症效果的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Aug 3;3(8):e2013249. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.13249.
定义成人强迫症的临床严重程度。
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;63:30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
4
A Metacognitive Perspective on Mindfulness: An Empirical Investigation.元认知视角下的正念:实证研究。
BMC Psychol. 2015 Jul 14;3(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0081-4. eCollection 2015.
5
A contemporary psychometric evaluation of the Obsessive Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R).强迫症量表修订版(OCI-R)的当代心理测量评估。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Sep;27(3):874-82. doi: 10.1037/pas0000075. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
6
The relevance of analogue studies for understanding obsessions and compulsions.模拟研究对于理解强迫观念和强迫行为的相关性。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2014 Apr;34(3):206-17. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 24.
7
Spanish version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS): psychometric properties and relation to obsessive beliefs.西班牙语版多维强迫量表(DOCS):心理测量特性及其与强迫观念的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;55(1):206-14. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
8
A comparison of psychometric properties between internet and paper versions of two depression instruments (BDI-II and MADRS-S) administered to clinic patients.针对临床患者使用的两种抑郁量表(贝克抑郁量表第二版和蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁量表简版)的网络版和纸质版心理测量特性的比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e49. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1392.
9
Assessment of obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions: development and evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale.强迫症症状维度评估:多维强迫量表的编制与评估。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Mar;22(1):180-98. doi: 10.1037/a0018260.
10
A Norwegian version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised: psychometric properties.挪威语版强迫症清单修订版:心理测量特性。
Scand J Psychol. 2010 Dec;51(6):509-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00798.x.