• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度临床试验参与者的补偿:差距分析。

Compensation to clinical trial participants in India: A gap analysis.

作者信息

Urooj Mohd, Husain Gulam Mohammed, Khan Mohammad Ahmed, Kazmi Munawwar Husain

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology, Central Research Institute of Unani Medicine, Under CCRUM, Ministry of AYUSH Government of India, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Investig. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):41-46. doi: 10.4103/jphi.JPHI_31_17.

DOI:10.4103/jphi.JPHI_31_17
PMID:28929045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5553263/
Abstract

The recent amendments notified by the Government of India, for conducting clinical trial, is greatly appreciable as promoting safety and well-being of human subjects. These rules clearly state that medical management of injuries in clinical trials is mandatory, and clinical trial-related injury or death needs to be compensated over and above the medical management. These rules need to be reconsidered for simplification and better understanding of issues regarding compensation. There is a need of clarity at some points which should be discussed with all stakeholders for better understanding of current regulations. In our view, attention must also be given to academic investigators, during discussion to promote availability of cost-effective treatment in India.

摘要

印度政府最近发布的关于开展临床试验的修正案,对于促进人类受试者的安全和福祉而言,非常值得赞赏。这些规则明确规定,临床试验中损伤的医疗处理是强制性的,并且除医疗处理外,与临床试验相关的损伤或死亡需要给予赔偿。这些规则需要重新审议,以简化并更好地理解赔偿相关问题。在某些方面需要明确,应与所有利益相关者进行讨论,以便更好地理解现行法规。我们认为,在讨论过程中还必须关注学术研究人员,以促进在印度提供具有成本效益的治疗。

相似文献

1
Compensation to clinical trial participants in India: A gap analysis.印度临床试验参与者的补偿:差距分析。
Int J Pharm Investig. 2017 Apr-Jun;7(2):41-46. doi: 10.4103/jphi.JPHI_31_17.
2
New rules for clinical trial-related injury and compensation.临床试验相关伤害与赔偿的新规定。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2013 Jul-Sep;10(3):197-200. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2013.058.
3
Compensation for clinical trial-related injury and death in India: challenges and the way forward.印度临床试验相关损伤与死亡的补偿:挑战与未来之路
Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;37(12):995-1002. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0230-3.
4
Disparate compensation policies for research related injury in an era of multinational trials: a case study of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.跨国试验时代针对研究相关损伤的不同补偿政策:以巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非为例的研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0244-y.
5
Injury and death in clinical trials and compensation: Rule 122 DAB.临床试验中的伤害与死亡及赔偿:第122条争端上诉委员会规则
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Oct;4(4):199-203. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.120167.
6
Review of policies for injuries to research participants in India.印度研究参与者伤害政策综述。
J Med Ethics. 2009 Feb;35(2):133-9. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.025155.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
8
Will the proposed compensation guidelines for research-related injury spell the death knell for clinical research in India?针对与研究相关损伤的拟议补偿指导方针会敲响印度临床研究的丧钟吗?
J Postgrad Med. 2012 Apr-Jun;58(2):156-8. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.97243.
9
New drugs and clinical trials rules 2019: Changes in responsibilities of the ethics committee.2019年新药与临床试验规则:伦理委员会职责的变化
Perspect Clin Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):37-43. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_208_19. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
10
Compensation for research-related injury in NIH-sponsored HIV/AIDS clinical trials in Africa.美国国立卫生研究院资助的非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病临床试验中与研究相关损伤的补偿
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Feb;8(1):45-54. doi: 10.1525/jer.2013.8.1.45.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of factors that act as barriers in conducting academic trials - An investigator's perception.开展学术试验的障碍因素评估——研究者的看法
Perspect Clin Res. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):73-79. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_76_23. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
2
Early and extended erythropoietin monotherapy after hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy: a multicentre double-blind pilot randomised controlled trial.缺氧缺血性脑病后早期和延长的红细胞生成素单药治疗:一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Oct 18;109(6):594-601. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327107.
3
Analysis of serious adverse events reports: Review by an Institutional Ethics Committee of a tertiary care teaching hospital.严重不良事件报告分析:一家三级护理教学医院的机构伦理委员会审查
Perspect Clin Res. 2022 Oct-Dec;13(4):189-193. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_293_20. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
4
Issues, challenges, and the way forward in conducting clinical trials among neonates: investigators' perspective.开展新生儿临床试验中的问题、挑战及未来方向:研究者视角。
J Perinatol. 2019 Sep;39(Suppl 1):20-30. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0469-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Compensation for clinical trial-related injury and death in India: challenges and the way forward.印度临床试验相关损伤与死亡的补偿:挑战与未来之路
Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;37(12):995-1002. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0230-3.
2
Compensation guidelines for research related injury in India.印度研究相关伤害的赔偿指南。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2012 Apr;60:53-5.
3
Inept media trials of clinical trials.对临床试验不恰当的媒体审判。
Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Apr;3(2):47-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.96442.
4
Compensation guidelines for research-related injury in India could destroy investigator-initiated research.
Natl Med J India. 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):35-7.
5
Medical negligence liability under the consumer protection act: A review of judicial perspective.《消费者保护法》下的医疗过失责任:司法视角审视
Indian J Urol. 2009 Jul;25(3):361-71. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.56205.
6
Reporting ethical processes in two Indian journals.两份印度期刊中的伦理流程报告。
Indian J Med Sci. 2008 Apr;62(4):134-40.
7
Strengthening clinical research in India.加强印度的临床研究。
Lancet. 2007 Apr 14;369(9569):1233. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60568-6.