Gajbhiye Snehalata Vijayanand, Dakhale Ganesh Natthuji, Chindhalore Chaitali Ashish, Gupta Ashish Vijay, Selvi E Tamil
Department of Pharmacology, AIIMS, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Perspect Clin Res. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):73-79. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_76_23. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
Academic trials are essential in investigating health research questions relevant to the society. Only a few leading research institutions in India have been engaged in academic trials. Thus, there is a need to understand what factors dampen the spirit of the academician in conducting academic clinical trials.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the investigator's perception of obstacles to carrying out academic trials and to identify factors that will motivate investigators in conducting academic trials.
We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital for 6 months. Faculty members working in academic institutes were selected. A structured questionnaire was designed for the study and administered using google forms. Responses were taken on a Likert scale. Validity and reliability assessments were carried out. Mann-Whitney test was applied to assess differences between demographic groups. <0.05 was considered significant.
Most of the participants rated applying for research grants (76%), obtaining funding for the study and making arrangements for compensation for trial-related events (75%) as extremely challenging. We found that the degree of challenge is significantly lower in the faculty members who conducted clinical trials in the past as against those who did not (P = 0.00069). We also found that the degree of challenge is significantly higher in the faculty members with <10 years of experience than those with >10 years of experience ( = 0.00001).
Thus, to conclude the challenges faced by investigators were at multiple levels, most common being applying for research grants and making arrangements for the funds for payment towards participation or study-related injury. Faculty members with exposure to conducting clinical trials and with experience of more than 10 years had perceived a reduced degree of challenges.
学术试验对于研究与社会相关的健康问题至关重要。印度只有少数领先的研究机构参与学术试验。因此,有必要了解哪些因素会打击院士开展学术临床试验的积极性。
本研究旨在评估研究者对开展学术试验障碍的看法,并确定能激励研究者开展学术试验的因素。
我们在一家三级护理医院进行了为期6个月的前瞻性观察研究。选取在学术机构工作的教职员工。为该研究设计了一份结构化问卷,并通过谷歌表单进行发放。采用李克特量表获取回复。进行了效度和信度评估。应用曼-惠特尼检验评估不同人口统计学组之间的差异。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
大多数参与者认为申请研究资助(76%)、为研究获得资金以及为试验相关事件安排补偿(75%)极具挑战性。我们发现,与未进行过临床试验的教职员工相比,过去进行过临床试验的教职员工面临的挑战程度显著更低(P = 0.00069)。我们还发现,经验少于10年的教职员工面临的挑战程度比经验超过10年的教职员工显著更高(P = 0.00001)。
因此,研究者面临的挑战是多方面的,最常见的是申请研究资助以及为参与研究或与研究相关的损伤支付费用安排资金。有临床试验经验且经验超过10年的教职员工感受到的挑战程度较低。