Kakizawa Nao, Noda Hiroshi, Watanabe Fumiaki, Ichida Kosuke, Suzuki Koichi, Rikiyama Toshiki
Department of Surgery, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma-cho, Omiya-ku, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan.
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):1129-1137. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4240-z.
To evaluate the clinical significance of a CT-based evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) in the postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in elderly patients.
Patients 70 years of age and older who were randomly assigned to Group A were compared with those younger than 70 who were assigned to Group B in terms of preoperative and intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes. We compared the patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) (Group C) to those without CR-POPF (Group D), and especially Group A. We also compared the patients with CR-POPF (Group E) to those without CR-POPF (Group E) to clarify the risk factors for POPF, in each of the analyses. The AAC score was determined using the methods of Agatston et al.
Group A more often had frequent atherosclerosis-related comorbidities (62.2%), low serum albumin (55.9%), and a high AAC score (66.1%). There were no significant differences in the postoperative variables. The comparisons between Groups C and D identified four independent risk factors for CR-POPF: BMI ≥ 25 (OR 8.54, 95% CI 3.15-23.1), male gender (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.28-7.85), soft pancreatic parenchyma (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.34-8.81), and the absence of MPD dilatation (OR 5.70, 95% CI 2.13-15.3). Comparisons between Groups E and F identified two independent risk factors for CR-POPF: BMI ≥ 25 (OR 29.4, 95% CI 5.77-150) and a high ACC score (OR 10.8, 95% CI 2.08-56.6).
We demonstrated, for the first time, that a high AAC score is a risk factor of CR-POPF in elderly patients who underwent PD.
评估基于CT的腹主动脉钙化(AAC)评估对老年患者胰十二指肠切除术(PD)术后结局的临床意义。
将随机分配至A组的70岁及以上患者与分配至B组的70岁以下患者在术前和术中变量及术后结局方面进行比较。我们将有临床相关术后胰瘘(CR-POPF)的患者(C组)与无CR-POPF的患者(D组)进行比较,特别是与A组比较。在每项分析中,我们还将有CR-POPF的患者(E组)与无CR-POPF的患者(F组)进行比较,以明确POPF的危险因素。使用阿加斯顿等人的方法确定AAC评分。
A组更常出现与动脉粥样硬化相关的合并症(62.2%)、低血清白蛋白(55.9%)和高AAC评分(66.1%)。术后变量无显著差异。C组和D组之间的比较确定了CR-POPF的四个独立危险因素:BMI≥25(比值比8.54,95%置信区间3.15-23.1)、男性(比值比3.17,95%置信区间1.28-7.85)、胰腺实质柔软(比值比3.43,95%置信区间1.34-8.81)以及主胰管未扩张(比值比5.70,95%置信区间2.13-15.3)。E组和F组之间的比较确定了CR-POPF的两个独立危险因素:BMI≥25(比值比29.4,95%置信区间5.77-150)和高ACC评分(比值比10.8,95%置信区间2.08-56.6)。
我们首次证明,高AAC评分是接受PD的老年患者发生CR-POPF的危险因素。