Wang Wenyan, Cui Yanxia, Fung Kin Hung, Zhang Ye, Ji Ting, Hao Yuying
Key Lab of Advanced Transducers and Intelligent Control System of Ministry of Education, College of Physics and Optoelectronics, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, 030024, China.
Department of Applied Physics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2017 Sep 19;12(1):538. doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2310-7.
Both the nanohole- and nanopillar-type patterned metallic electrodes (PMEs) have been introduced in organic solar cells (OSCs) for improving device performances experimentally, but there is few work addressing the similarities and differences between them. In this theoretical work, we systematically compare the impact of the nanohole- and nanopillar-type PMEs on the performance of an OSC based on hybridized cavity resonances. By optimizing the geometrical parameters of each PME, we obtained an interesting result that the integrated absorption efficiencies in the active layer with different optimized PMEs are almost the same (both are equal to 82.4%), outperforming that of the planar control by 9.9%. Though the absorption enhancement spectra of the two different optimal devices are similar as well, the mechanisms of light trapping at the corresponding enhancement peaks are distinct from each other. In a comprehensive view, the nanopillar-type PME is suggested to be applied in the present system, since its optimal design has a moderate filling ratio, which is much easier to fabricate than its counterpart. This work could contribute to the development of high-efficiency OSCs.
纳米孔型和纳米柱型图案化金属电极(PMEs)都已被引入有机太阳能电池(OSCs)中,用于通过实验提高器件性能,但很少有工作涉及它们之间的异同。在这项理论工作中,我们基于杂化腔共振系统地比较了纳米孔型和纳米柱型PMEs对OSC性能的影响。通过优化每种PME的几何参数,我们得到了一个有趣的结果,即具有不同优化PMEs的有源层中的积分吸收效率几乎相同(均等于82.4%),比平面对照高出9.9%。尽管两种不同优化器件的吸收增强光谱也相似,但在相应增强峰处的光捕获机制彼此不同。综合来看,建议在本系统中应用纳米柱型PME,因为其优化设计具有适中的填充率,比其对应物更容易制造。这项工作有助于高效OSCs的发展。