Sinche Melanie, Layton Rebekah L, Brandt Patrick D, O'Connell Anna B, Hall Joshua D, Freeman Ashalla M, Harrell Jessica R, Cook Jeanette Gowen, Brennwald Patrick J
The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, United States of America.
Office of Graduate Education, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0185023. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185023. eCollection 2017.
PhD recipients acquire discipline-specific knowledge and a range of relevant skills during their training in the life sciences, physical sciences, computational sciences, social sciences, and engineering. Empirically testing the applicability of these skills to various careers held by graduates will help assess the value of current training models. This report details results of an Internet survey of science PhDs (n = 8099) who provided ratings for fifteen transferrable skills. Indeed, analyses indicated that doctoral training develops these transferrable skills, crucial to success in a wide range of careers including research-intensive (RI) and non-research-intensive (NRI) careers. Notably, the vast majority of skills were transferrable across both RI and NRI careers, with the exception of three skills that favored RI careers (creativity/innovative thinking, career planning and awareness skills, and ability to work with people outside the organization) and three skills that favored NRI careers (time management, ability to learn quickly, ability to manage a project). High overall rankings suggested that graduate training imparted transferrable skills broadly. Nonetheless, we identified gaps between career skills needed and skills developed in PhD training that suggest potential areas for improvement in graduate training. Therefore, we suggest that a two-pronged approach is crucial to maximizing existing career opportunities for PhDs and developing a career-conscious training model: 1) encouraging trainees to recognize their existing individual skill sets, and 2) increasing resources and programmatic interventions at the institutional level to address skill gaps. Lastly, comparison of job satisfaction ratings between PhD-trained employees in both career categories indicated that those in NRI career paths were just as satisfied in their work as their RI counterparts. We conclude that PhD training prepares graduates for a broad range of satisfying careers, potentially more than trainees and program leaders currently appreciate.
博士学位获得者在生命科学、物理科学、计算科学、社会科学和工程学的培训过程中,掌握了特定学科的知识以及一系列相关技能。通过实证检验这些技能对毕业生所从事的各种职业的适用性,将有助于评估当前培训模式的价值。本报告详细介绍了一项针对科学博士(n = 8099)的网络调查结果,这些博士对十五种可转移技能进行了评分。事实上,分析表明博士培训培养了这些可转移技能,这些技能对于包括研究密集型(RI)和非研究密集型(NRI)职业在内的广泛职业的成功至关重要。值得注意的是,绝大多数技能在RI和NRI职业中都具有可转移性,但有三种技能更有利于RI职业(创造力/创新思维、职业规划和意识技能以及与组织外部人员合作的能力),还有三种技能更有利于NRI职业(时间管理、快速学习能力、项目管理能力)。总体排名较高表明研究生培训广泛传授了可转移技能。尽管如此,我们发现博士培训中所培养的技能与职业所需技能之间存在差距,这表明研究生培训可能存在需要改进的潜在领域。因此,我们建议,采取双管齐下的方法对于最大限度地增加博士现有的职业机会以及制定注重职业发展的培训模式至关重要:1)鼓励受训者认识到自己现有的个人技能组合,2)在机构层面增加资源和计划干预措施以弥补技能差距。最后,对这两类职业中接受过博士培训的员工的工作满意度评分进行比较表明,从事NRI职业道路的员工对工作的满意度与从事RI职业的员工相同。我们得出结论,博士培训为毕业生准备了广泛的令人满意的职业,其潜力可能超过受训者和项目负责人目前的认识。