• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于采样时间导致的每日土壤二氧化碳通量估算的潜在偏差。

Potential bias of daily soil CO efflux estimates due to sampling time.

作者信息

Cueva Alejandro, Bullock Stephen H, López-Reyes Eulogio, Vargas Rodrigo

机构信息

Departamento de Biología de la Conservación, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada, B.C., Ensenada, Baja California, 22860, Mexico.

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):11925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11849-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-11849-y
PMID:28931840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5607316/
Abstract

Soil respiration (Rs) has been usually measured during daylight hours using manual chambers. This approach assumes that measurements made during a typical time interval (e.g., 9 to 11 am) represent the mean daily value; locally, this may not always be correct and could result in systematic bias of daily and annual Rs budgets. We propose a simple method, based on the temporal stability concept, to determine the most appropriate time of the day for manual measurements to capture a representative mean daily Rs value. We introduce a correction factor to adjust for biases due to non-optimally timed sampling. This approach was tested in a semiarid shrubland using 24 hr campaigns using two treatments: trenched plots and plots with shrubs. In general, we found optimum times were at night and potential biases ranged from -29 to + 40% in relation to the 24 hr mean of Rs, especially in trenched plots. The degree of bias varied between treatments and seasons, having a greater influence during the wet season when efflux was high than during the dry season when efflux was low. This study proposes a framework for improving local Rs estimates that informs how to decrease temporal uncertainties in upscaling to the annual total.

摘要

土壤呼吸(Rs)通常在白天使用手动气室进行测量。这种方法假定在典型时间间隔(例如上午9点至11点)进行的测量代表每日平均值;在当地,情况可能并非总是如此,这可能会导致每日和年度Rs预算出现系统偏差。我们提出了一种基于时间稳定性概念的简单方法,以确定一天中进行手动测量以获取代表性每日Rs平均值的最合适时间。我们引入一个校正因子来调整由于采样时间不理想而产生的偏差。在一个半干旱灌丛地区,采用两种处理方式(挖沟地块和有灌木的地块)进行了24小时的试验,对该方法进行了测试。总体而言,我们发现最佳测量时间是在夜间,相对于Rs的24小时平均值,潜在偏差范围为-29%至+40%,特别是在挖沟地块。偏差程度在不同处理方式和季节之间有所不同,在通量较高的雨季比通量较低的旱季影响更大。本研究提出了一个改进局部Rs估算的框架,该框架为如何在扩大到年度总量时减少时间不确定性提供了指导。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/a3043b82a7ff/41598_2017_11849_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/9a2278ab4508/41598_2017_11849_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/fc8e179f35b4/41598_2017_11849_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/a3043b82a7ff/41598_2017_11849_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/9a2278ab4508/41598_2017_11849_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/fc8e179f35b4/41598_2017_11849_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/84ad/5607316/a3043b82a7ff/41598_2017_11849_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Potential bias of daily soil CO efflux estimates due to sampling time.由于采样时间导致的每日土壤二氧化碳通量估算的潜在偏差。
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):11925. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11849-y.
2
Seasonal and annual changes in soil respiration in relation to soil temperature, water potential and trenching.土壤呼吸的季节性和年度变化与土壤温度、水势及挖沟的关系
Tree Physiol. 2004 Apr;24(4):415-24. doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.4.415.
3
Spatial biases of information influence global estimates of soil respiration: How can we improve global predictions?信息的空间偏差会影响土壤呼吸的全球估算:我们如何才能提高全球预测的准确性?
Glob Chang Biol. 2021 Aug;27(16):3923-3938. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15666. Epub 2021 May 20.
4
Temperature response of soil respiration in a Chinese pine plantation: hysteresis and seasonal vs. diel Q10.土壤呼吸对温度的响应:中国油松人工林的滞后及季节与昼夜 Q10。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057858. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
A comparison of manual and automated systems for soil CO2 flux measurements: trade-offs between spatial and temporal resolution.土壤二氧化碳通量测量中手动和自动系统的比较:空间和时间分辨率之间的权衡。
J Exp Bot. 2003 Mar;54(384):891-9. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg121.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
[Effects of Simulated Acid Rain on Soil Respiration and Heterotrophic Respiration in a Secondary Forest].[模拟酸雨对次生林土壤呼吸和异养呼吸的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Mar 8;38(3):1235-1244. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201608206.
8
[Interannual Variations of Soil Respiration and Its Temperature Sensitivity in an Orchard in Jinci Region of Taiyuan City].[太原市晋祠地区果园土壤呼吸及其温度敏感性的年际变化]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2016 Sep 8;37(9):3625-3633. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2016.09.046.
9
Variation in foliar respiration and wood CO2 efflux rates among species and canopy layers in a wet tropical forest.湿润热带森林中不同物种和冠层间叶片呼吸作用及木材二氧化碳排放速率的变化
Tree Physiol. 2015 Feb;35(2):148-59. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu107. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
10
Continuous measurement of soil carbon efflux with Forced Diffusion (FD) chambers in a tundra ecosystem of Alaska.用强制扩散(FD)室连续测量阿拉斯加苔原生态系统中的土壤碳通量。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Oct 1;566-567:175-184. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.052. Epub 2016 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical Guide to Measuring Wetland Carbon Pools and Fluxes.湿地碳库与通量测量实用指南
Wetlands (Wilmington). 2023;43(8):105. doi: 10.1007/s13157-023-01722-2. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
2
Historically inconsistent productivity and respiration fluxes in the global terrestrial carbon cycle.历史上不一致的全球陆地碳循环生产力和呼吸通量。
Nat Commun. 2022 Apr 1;13(1):1733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29391-5.
3
Soil CO emission in response to organic amendments, temperature, and rainfall.土壤 CO 排放对有机肥料、温度和降雨的响应。

本文引用的文献

1
Root systems of chaparral shrubs.丛林灌木的根系。
Oecologia. 1977 Jun;29(2):163-177. doi: 10.1007/BF00345795.
2
Osmotic and hydraulic adjustment of mangrove saplings to extreme salinity.红树林幼树对极端盐度的渗透调节和水力调节
Tree Physiol. 2016 Dec;36(12):1562-1572. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpw073. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
3
Importance of nondiffusive transport for soil CO efflux in a temperate mountain grassland.非扩散传输对温带山地草原土壤CO₂通量的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5849. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62267-6.
4
Automated measurements of greenhouse gases fluxes from tree stems and soils: magnitudes, patterns and drivers.树木茎干和土壤温室气体通量的自动测量:幅度、模式和驱动因素。
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 8;9(1):4005. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39663-8.
J Geophys Res Biogeosci. 2015 Mar;120(3):502-512. doi: 10.1002/2014JG002788. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
Sampling frequency affects estimates of annual nitrous oxide fluxes.采样频率会影响一氧化二氮年通量的估算。
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 2;5:15912. doi: 10.1038/srep15912.
5
Gap filling strategies and error in estimating annual soil respiration.填补空白策略与年土壤呼吸估算误差。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jun;19(6):1941-52. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12127. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
6
Looking deeper into the soil: biophysical controls and seasonal lags of soil CO2 production and efflux.深入土壤探究:土壤 CO2 产生和排放的生物物理控制和季节性滞后。
Ecol Appl. 2010 Sep;20(6):1569-82. doi: 10.1890/09-0693.1.
7
The significance of phloem transport for the speed with which canopy photosynthesis and belowground respiration are linked.韧皮部运输对树冠光合作用和地下呼吸之间联系速度的重要性。
New Phytol. 2010 Jan;185(1):189-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03050.x. Epub 2009 Oct 13.
8
Does photosynthesis affect grassland soil-respired CO2 and its carbon isotope composition on a diurnal timescale?在昼夜时间尺度上,光合作用是否会影响草原土壤呼吸释放的二氧化碳及其碳同位素组成?
New Phytol. 2009;182(2):451-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02755.x. Epub 2009 Feb 11.
9
Environmental controls and the influence of vegetation type, fine roots and rhizomorphs on diel and seasonal variation in soil respiration.环境控制以及植被类型、细根和菌根对土壤呼吸日变化和季节变化的影响。
New Phytol. 2008 Jul;179(2):460-471. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02481.x.
10
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change.土壤碳分解的温度敏感性及其对气候变化的反馈
Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):165-73. doi: 10.1038/nature04514.