Wang Man-Ling, Galvez Carlos, Chen Jin-Shing, Navarro-Martinez Jose, Bolufer Sergio, Hung Ming-Hui, Hsu Hsao-Hsung, Cheng Ya-Jung
Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, University General Hospital of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Aug;9(8):2587-2598. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.08.96.
Non-intubated single-incision procedures are slowly expanding because of high experience and skill required, and stricter selection criteria. The aim of this study is to present the first retrospective two-center series in Taiwan and Spain.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 188 patients undergoing non-intubated single-incision video-assisted thoracic surgery (NI-SI-VATS) procedures between July 2013 to November 2015 in two centers in Taiwan (170 patients) and Spain (18 patients) with two different anesthetic methods. Demographic data, clinicopathological features, preoperative tests, and final outcomes were analyzed to compare the outcomes with the two different techniques.
Of the 188 patients, 147 (78%) were women, with a mean body mass index (BMI) of 22.7. Of the 196 specimens, 145 (74%) were malignancies with a mean size of 9.7 mm. Wedge resection was performed in 172 patients (91.4%), anatomical segmentectomy with lymphadenectomy in 8 (4.7%), and lobectomy with lymphadenectomy in 5 (2.6%). Three patients (1.6%) required conversion to orotracheal intubation, while 5 patients (2.7%) required additional ports. Complications appeared in 16 patients (8.5%) with air leak as the most frequent in 7 cases (3.7%). Median chest drainage was 1 day, and median postoperative stay was 3 days. There was neither perioperative death nor postoperative readmission.
Non-intubated single-incision procedures can be feasible and safe in expert hands and experienced teams, even for anatomical resections. Strict selection criteria, skill and experience are mandatory. Comparative cohorts and randomized trials are needed.
由于所需经验和技能要求较高,且选择标准更为严格,非插管单切口手术正在缓慢推广。本研究旨在呈现台湾和西班牙的首个回顾性双中心系列研究。
我们对2013年7月至2015年11月期间在台湾(170例患者)和西班牙(18例患者)的两个中心接受非插管单切口电视辅助胸腔镜手术(NI-SI-VATS)的188例患者进行了回顾性分析,采用了两种不同的麻醉方法。分析了人口统计学数据、临床病理特征、术前检查和最终结果,以比较两种不同技术的结果。
188例患者中,147例(78%)为女性,平均体重指数(BMI)为22.7。196个标本中,145个(74%)为恶性肿瘤,平均大小为9.7毫米。172例患者(91.4%)进行了楔形切除术,8例(4.7%)进行了解剖性节段切除术并伴有淋巴结清扫,5例(2.6%)进行了肺叶切除术并伴有淋巴结清扫。3例患者(1.6%)需要转为经口气管插管,5例患者(2.7%)需要增加切口。16例患者(8.5%)出现并发症,其中7例(3.7%)最常见的是漏气。中位胸腔引流时间为1天,中位术后住院时间为3天。围手术期无死亡病例,术后无再次入院病例。
对于经验丰富的团队,即使是进行解剖性切除,非插管单切口手术也是可行且安全的。严格的选择标准、技能和经验是必不可少的。需要进行对照队列研究和随机试验。