Guo Zhihua, Yin Weiqiang, Pan Hui, Zhang Xin, Xu Xin, Shao Wenlong, Chen Hanzhang, He Jianxing
1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 2 Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Disease & China State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China ; 3 National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou 510120, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Mar;8(3):359-68. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.02.50.
The aim of this study was to reveal the short-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) segmentectomy without tracheal intubation compared with intubated general anesthesia with one-lung ventilation (OLV).
We performed a retrospective review of our institutional database of consecutive 140 patients undergoing VATS anatomical segmentectomy from July 2011 to June 2015. Among them, 48 patients were treated without tracheal intubation using a combination of thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), intrathoracic vagal blockade, and sedation (non-intubated group). The other 92 patients were treated with intubated general anesthesia (intubated group). Safety and feasibility was evaluated by comparing the perioperative profiles and short-term outcomes of these two groups.
Two groups had comparable surgical durations, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative chest tube drainage volume, and numbers of dissected lymph nodes (P>0.05). Patients who underwent non-intubated segmentectomy had higher peak end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) during operation (44.81 vs. 33.15 mmHg, P<0.001), less white blood cell changes before and after surgery (△WBC) (6.08×10(9) vs. 7.75×10(9), P=0.004), earlier resumption of oral intake (6.76 vs. 17.58 hours, P<0.001), shorter duration of postoperative chest tube drainage (2.25 vs. 3.16 days, P=0.047), less cost of anesthesia (¥5,757.19 vs. ¥7,401.85, P<0.001), and a trend toward shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.04 vs. 7.83 days, P=0.057). One patient (2.1%) in the non-intubated group required conversion to intubated OLV since a significant mediastinal movement. In the intubated group, there was one patient (1.1%) required conversion to thoracotomy due to uncontrolled bleeding. The incidence difference of postoperative complications between groups was not significant (P=0.248). There was no in-hospital death in either group.
Compared with intubated general anesthesia, non-intubated thoracoscopic segmentectomy is a safe, technically feasible and economical alternative with comparable short-term outcomes. Patients underwent non-intubated thoracoscopic segmentectomy could gain a prompt recovery.
本研究旨在揭示与气管插管全身麻醉下单肺通气(OLV)相比,非气管插管电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺段切除术的短期结局。
我们对2011年7月至2015年6月期间连续140例行VATS解剖性肺段切除术患者的机构数据库进行了回顾性分析。其中,48例患者采用胸段硬膜外麻醉(TEA)、胸内迷走神经阻滞和镇静联合的方法进行非气管插管治疗(非插管组)。另外92例患者采用气管插管全身麻醉(插管组)。通过比较两组的围手术期情况和短期结局来评估安全性和可行性。
两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后胸腔闭式引流量和清扫淋巴结数目相当(P>0.05)。非插管肺段切除术患者术中呼气末二氧化碳分压(EtCO2)峰值较高(44.81 vs. 33.15 mmHg,P<0.001),手术前后白细胞变化(△WBC)较小(6.08×10⁹ vs. 7.75×10⁹,P = 0.004),恢复经口进食较早(6.76 vs. 17.58小时,P<0.001),术后胸腔闭式引流时间较短(2.25 vs. 3.16天,P = 0.047),麻醉费用较低(5757.19元 vs. 7401.85元,P<0.001),且术后住院时间有缩短趋势(6.04 vs. 7.83天,P = 0.057)。非插管组有1例患者(2.1%)因纵隔明显移动需要转为插管OLV。插管组有1例患者(1.1%)因出血无法控制需要转为开胸手术。两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.248)。两组均无院内死亡。
与气管插管全身麻醉相比,非插管胸腔镜肺段切除术是一种安全、技术上可行且经济的替代方法,短期结局相当。接受非插管胸腔镜肺段切除术的患者恢复较快。